SantosHalper
Get off my lawn
What defines a "star"? Scoring? Draft overall number? Trophies? Stanley Cup victory? Or all the above? McDavid and Matthews are considered as stars, they have the draft overall number, scoring and trophies but neither of them haven't been near of even playing in the finals.I believe those are approximate numbers. Still to be a serious contender you need 2-3 star forwards, 2 1st pair D logging 22+ minutes a game and a reliable goalie. You can find these in any Stanley Cup winner.
As of now we have 1 F and 1 D. Will probably get G (Cossa/Augustine) and another D (Ed/ASP/Wallinder).
We don't have offense at all. I mean completely. Those thinking Raymond, Danielsson, Kasper may become even remotely close to say Stone or Point are delusional.
Point, a 3rd round pick who was still playing in the juniors in his D+2 year but that didn't stop him becoming a star. Same story with Stone, a 6th round pick and no one considered that he becomes a star when he was playing his D+4 year in AHL. Let me even throw in Marchessault, undrafted but consistent 60-point guy and a Cup/Conn Smythe winner, thats something what the mega stars haven't be able to do so far. Is Marchessault a star? He managed to become one after he spent 4 years in AHL. And we have examples of our own Datsyuk and Zetterberg, no one considered that they become stars 2 years after they were drafted. And there are more examples, who weren't stars when they got drafted but became stars anyway.
Ray was drafted just 4 years ago, Kasper 2 years ago and Danielson 1 year ago. So how about if we give them time and see what we really got. Our prospects haven't even hit their prime yet.
We have no offense? Come on huh, 13 players have scored +10 goals and Seider is 3 away, and there is 18 games left. And Wings have 8th most goals in NHL.
Hockey is a team sport, all the McDrais and Leafs Big 4 don't take you to the cup victory unless the team is deep and well roled.