cobra427
Registered User
- May 6, 2012
- 9,383
- 3,421
I don't think Raanta has more leverage period. Your forgetting he is an unproven #1 goalie and that there are very few starting jobs open. Some teams might think Raanta could be their #1 goalie but they are already paying a goalie starter money. They won't risk and can't afford to have 6 mill+ locked up in 2 goalies by signing Raanta. If Raanta has a poor finish or has a more serious injury, it sure does hurt his value.You don't think Raanta has more leverage after the deadline than after? That's interesting logic. Especially since the GM now has to sign him or the alternative is looking like a complete neophyte (which he is). He also has nothing to lose by testing the market. He has zero urgency. Chayka now carries all the downside.
And if Raanta has a poor finish or gets injured, his valuation (and his agent's) doesn't change much. Offering him substantially less money than yesterday just makes him more likely to test the market in free agency.
So we're back to, if you think he's your guy, you should have signed him. And if you think he's not your guy long-term or wants too much to sign, you should have dealt him for assets instead of putting yourself behind the eightball the rest of the way.
Chayka did the right thing, no need to negotiate with yourself. There won't be a bidding war for Raanta, he'll get unproven starter market rates from the Coyotes, a for sure starters job in the waiting for him.