F A N
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2005
- 19,935
- 6,616
Are there any examples of a better 3 game or longer playoff statline in nhl history?
I think Patrick Roy, Dominik Hasek, and or Bill Ranford might have had a similar stretch.
Are there any examples of a better 3 game or longer playoff statline in nhl history?
Those 3 games show he has the potential to be great. I would rather gamble on him as the #1 goalie rather than hoping marky can sustain his play for the next 6-7 years.
Lol!....Peter Deboer in his autopsy of the Knights crashing out of the playoffs, blamed Demko....saying that he got into the heads of his shooters and their scoring slump carried over into the Dallas series. Wow! Too bad the Canucks couldn't have found a way to squeeze past Vegas. I actually think they'd have given the Stars a tougher series.
But if the Canucks were to kick the tires on a Demko trade, his value is sky-high right now.
Jacob Markstrom is the second best goaltender in Vancouver Canucks history.
It's not a joke.
K. McLean or R. Brodeur fans may be upset to hear this, but they're all 40+ and have to recognize that the game is different now. Especially the goaltending position.
Having said all that, there's just something lingering underneath all the positive Markstrom has done in the past 2-3 years.
He's 30. It took him so long to get to this point.
He has been so consistent and so dominant at his position for the past 18 months or so, and it's a delight to see.
But Demko has been consistent and dominant his entire life.
These are two players with almost identical draft pedigrees (some of the first goalies taken in their respective drafts), both considered among the very best goaltending prospects in their age group.
That's where their careers start to deviate.
Marky was forced into what was essentially a starter's role in Florida when he was a raw young goalie, and they were a glorified AHL team.
He was shelled, repeatedly. It was tough to watch.
I obviously had no way to anticipate he would end up a Canuck, but I recall being inclined to keep tabs on his career. I thought he was an endlessly intriguing goaltender. That size, that tenacity.
But it just looked like he wasn't going to be able to put it all together.
Luongo asks to go back to Florida, Canucks say "Well, we need to get a goalie back".
I don't think Gillis saw Markstrom as anything more than a roll of the dice.
He basically started ground zero in Utica and built his way back up. Learns a little bit from Ryan Miller, settles in a starter's role, and his career takes off.
Demko on the other hand, has been groomed by Vancouver perfectly and has performed at every single level he's played:
- Starter at Boston College, ten shutouts in his final year. Absolutely dominant Collegiate career.
- Good showing for Team USA at the World Juniors. Exceptional game against Canada, in particular.
- Graduates to the AHL, and quickly (like within 2-3 months) takes over the starting role. He was Utica's shining star on some pretty poor rosters. Performs so admirably at the AHL level as a young player, he gets invited to the World Hockey Championship.
- Transitions to backup end of season (no playoffs), then gets one full season as backup in his official Rookie season.
Thatcher Demko was one of the top 10-15 Rookies in the league this year, guys.
Please stop this narrative "he was inconsistent", "didn't step up when Markstrom was hurt". Even if true, he was a Rookie in the best league in the world. And a very good Rookie at that.
You know what they say about the bird in the hand...
But I don't know how you can vote against TD after everything he's proven so far. Marky is an exceptional goaltender today, but Thatcher has youth and limitless potential on his side.
Going to be a very interesting few weeks in Vancouver.
If the Dumba rumors are true, I could see Jimwit packaging Virtanen, Demko and Stecher for Dumba.
I find it interesting that Markstrom has a SV% of 0.97 and GAA of 1 in the two games against Vancouver and a SV% of 0.87 and a GAA of 3.7 in his other 3 games. Very small sample size but interesting. Fits with the narrative that he was highly motivated playing against Vancouver.After both players being at 5 games played thus far into the season, Demko and Markstrom have nearly identical records. Same amount of wins, and almost the exact same save percentage.
It's going to be hard not to compare them for the rest of the season, and perhaps even beyond that. Will be very interesting to see how it plays out.
Nobody has annointed him anything. The preemptive "Calm down" post isn't necessary.He looked solid against Ottawa but then Ottawa are a wretched hockey team playing on the road. Holtby looked solid against them too. Hell I'm betting almost ANYBODY would have looked good against the Sens. Let's see him play some elite teams first before we anoit him the GOAT shall we?
Nobody has annointed him anything. The preemptive "Calm down" post isn't necessary.
In most of the games Demko has played this season, the Canucks as a team have basically hung him out to dry. That game last night could have been 12-3, given the number of 10-bell saves he was forced to make.
Everybody knew that with Markstrom gone, the Canucks would have to tighten up defensively. But so far, they've actually been worse. Holtby must be beginning to wonder what the hell he signed up for.
You are wrong, there are many posters here who are already referring to Holtby at the "4 million dollar backup". There were at least a dozen "Holtby's got to make that save" posts (as well as even a couple of "Holtby sucks" posts) the other night against MTL even though IMHO none of the goals were even remotely "bad" goals... unlike last night's wrong side blooper. Now I say this as a fan of Demko but I think he's is still lacking experience, something that Holtby has in spades. One thing is completely certain: goaltending is NOT our problem, terrible save % numbers aside (lately that is)...