The problem is, even if we were to trade for Parros, basically 100% of the Ranger's physicality would be coming from one dark corner of the lineup that would likely get the least ice time of any player on the team.
The beauty of that 2011-12 team wasn't just having Prust and Dubinsky, it was being able to roll 3 out of 4 lines with truculent *******s on them, as well as having Bickel on the 3rd d-pair, who for all his faults as a defender was probably one of the 3 most intimidating fighters the Rangers have had in the last 5 years, at least.
On that team, 75% of the lines and 33% of the D pairs had at least one person who would engage physically with the opposing team. Dubinsky -2nd line Prust -3rd line Rupp/Bickel-4th line
Even if we were to add a legit HW, in the span of an entire hockey game, literally the only time throughout the entire game we could be expected to bring an average or above average physical/aggressive style of play would be the 7-9 minutes out of 60 that the 4th line is on the ice. Think about that, out of an entire hockey game, the only chance this team has of physically overpowering their opponent occurs roughly 10-15% of the game. It's a changing game but this is still hockey we're talking about.
To be perfectly honest, as Staal's injuries keep piling up, a swap of Staal for Skinner is starting to look better and better. No matter what, there's got to be a 50% chance at least that Staal bolts to play with his brothers when his contract is up. Skinner is an elite scorer the Rangers are lacking, not to mention he plays with some bite to his game. Skinner's had concussions, but now it's looking like Staal has had some + the eye thing too. At the start of the season, I had real high hopes for Staal, and wouldn't have wanted the trade... now at this point in the season, I'm not sure Carolina says yes to the trade.
Bring in Skinner to help the offense, then find some way to replace Staal with a mean SOB #4. The Kings happen to have 3 of them in W. Mitchell, M. Greene, Regehr, though I don't think they trade any of them. But a player like that, to fill in the 4 spot. Honestly the perfect dman would be someone like Bieksa or James Wisniewski or even an Orpik.
Are the Rangers not better off after:
Staal for Skinner
DZ, Boyle for Bieksa +
4th or 5th for Krys Barch/Ben Eager type 4th line winger? Or even Parros... but I'd rather someone who can PK, esp. if giving up Boyle
Then in a perfect world you dangle Brassard for a Prust-type, banging third line winger with some goal scoring potential.
And thus, while keeping pretty much the entire core of the team, you still manage to significantly improve the overall toughness. Not to mention that as much as I love honestly do love Boyle, we could finally stop living in fear of the next time he ends up dropping the gloves...
It might hurt a bit, but at this point I'm doing it.