monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
Team should get the full PP chance even if it rolls past 60 regulation minutes. | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Team should get the full PP chance even if it rolls past 60 regulation minutes.

Extending time isn't really workable but I like the penalty shot idea. Right now you are incentivized to take penalties as time winds down because there's not enough time to get a full pp.

I also have always thought there should be plays that start with one team in possession.
 
Your take.
no please.gif
 
We all complain about the quality of officiating and you want to make a rule that gives a referee even more power to screw things up.
 
Just watched Utah win 2-1 over SJ but there was a double minor high sticking call late to Utah; SJ wasn’t able to score in regulation but had 3 minutes+ of PP time lost.

I know there’s been threads on this before but not going to find it with the site updating.

I think if a team down and gets a late PP like this they should get the opportunity to run their full PP even if it runs a bit after 60 minutes. Of course if they take a penalty or the shorthanded team scores then it’s game over.

Your take.
So why would a team that’s won the game, want to keep playing, can’t think of any league wanting to do that.

if for some dumb reason, teams did keep playing, why does the game suddenly end, if another penalty. If the short handed team scored they should win the game. (Makes as much sense).
 
Extended time is ugly and would cause issues.

Maybe if you lose more than a minute, an option for a penalty shot occurs. I could live with that
 
Doesn't matter when a penalty happens. If you can't tie or win in 60 minutes, you don't deserve extra time. That's my take.
 
So why would a team that’s won the game, want to keep playing, can’t think of any league wanting to do that.

if for some dumb reason, teams did keep playing, why does the game suddenly end, if another penalty. If the short handed team scored they should win the game. (Makes as much sense).
I said if the team that’s down/trailing gets a late PP.
 
I said if the team that’s down/trailing gets a late PP.
Ahh ok, no that would be dumb of the league to make that change, the game is over. Lots of holes in that idea.
Not to mention would n’t get past the rules committee.
 
Took me way too long to realize you weren’t talking about rolling PP minutes into overtime. I thought “don’t they already do that?”

But you’re actually talking about extending the game to play out a powerplay?

Oh god please no
 
Took me way too long to realize you weren’t talking about rolling PP minutes into overtime. I thought “don’t they already do that?”

But you’re actually talking about extending the game to play out a powerplay?

Oh god please no
Thought the same at first, and ya no.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->