Team should get the full PP chance even if it rolls past 60 regulation minutes.

[GrandBison]

Watch the refs hide their whistle if that ever happens.

 

[karltonian]

Extending time isn't really workable but I like the penalty shot idea. Right now you are incentivized to take penalties as time winds down because there's not enough time to get a full pp.

I also have always thought there should be plays that start with one team in possession.

 

[ItWasJustified]

Your take.

 

[dirtydanglez]

i like it but make it a penalty shot.

 

[karltonian]

Maybe even give the team a choice of pp or ps.

 

[strattonius]

We all complain about the quality of officiating and you want to make a rule that gives a referee even more power to screw things up.

 

[Golden_Jet]

Just watched Utah win 2-1 over SJ but there was a double minor high sticking call late to Utah; SJ wasn’t able to score in regulation but had 3 minutes+ of PP time lost.

I know there’s been threads on this before but not going to find it with the site updating.

I think if a team down and gets a late PP like this they should get the opportunity to run their full PP even if it runs a bit after 60 minutes. Of course if they take a penalty or the shorthanded team scores then it’s game over.

Your take.

So why would a team that’s won the game, want to keep playing, can’t think of any league wanting to do that.

if for some dumb reason, teams did keep playing, why does the game suddenly end, if another penalty. If the short handed team scored they should win the game. (Makes as much sense).

 

[DJJones]

Extended time is ugly and would cause issues.

Maybe if you lose more than a minute, an option for a penalty shot occurs. I could live with that