Olympics: Team Russia 2022

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

You know what? Again it's the KHL reporting. Why? This is a hot mess. Until there is something official from actually FHR it is a stupid, dumb, idiotic soap opera of musical chairs.

FHR only has this to offer

Экспертный совет рекомендовал назначить главным тренером национальной сборной России Алексея Жамнова

It says AGAIN "recomended". Whatever those fools mean. Can't they just shut up, not leak anything and come up with a final decision?
 
You know what? Again it's the KHL reporting. Why? This is a hot mess. Until there is something official from actually FHR it is a stupid, dumb, idiotic soap opera of musical chairs.

FHR only has this to offer

Экспертный совет рекомендовал назначить главным тренером национальной сборной России Алексея Жамнова

It says AGAIN "recomended". Whatever those fools mean. Can't they just shut up, not leak anything and come up with a final decision?
I mean all the biggest sites report this official decision, sports.ru has "reaction interviews" with pretty much everyone on the planet. I don't think this is the case of it "not being official", it's just FHR being slow or inconcrete if anything.

P.S. Cue in my post about Znarok or any other decent coach not wanting to dance to idiotic opera of musical chairs.
 
I mean all the biggest sites report this official decision, sports.ru has "reaction interviews" with pretty much everyone on the planet. I don't think this is the case of it "not being official", it's just FHR being slow or inconcrete if anything.

P.S. Cue in my post about Znarok or any other decent coach not wanting to dance to idiotic opera of musical chairs.
Sports.ru, just like a bunch of others had lengthy features, interviews and whatnot about Znarok's appointment not two days ago.

There is only one source that is official. It is the FHR. And it's website says "recomended". That's close to nothing in my book.
 
Gusev - Namestnikov - Kucherov
Panarin - Kuznetsov - Tarasenko
Kaprizov - Malkin - Svechnikov
Mikheyev - Barbashev - Nichushkin
Radulov, Gurianov, Dadonov, Buchnevich, Ovechkin - yeah, we have a lot of good wingers.

Zaitsev - Provorov
Romanov - Sergachev
Gavrikov - Orlov
Zub, Kulikov, Zadorov

Vasilevsky
Shesterkin
Sorokin
Kuznetsov has been suspended 4 years from international play . It also wouldn't be surprising if Malkin didn't play in the Olympics .
 
Kuznetsov has been suspended 4 years from international play . It also wouldn't be surprising if Malkin didn't play in the Olympics .

Malkin has only been declared out for 2 months. He is on track to be back well before the Olympics, and will play barring any major setbacks in his training.
 
Regarding the coach selection: who cares? This team usually gets eliminated in the quarterfinals, Zhamnov cannot fail more than his predecessors. And whether he has been recommended for the job or actually appointed, doesn't matter.

What worries me is our situation down the middle with Kuzy out and Malkin recovering from injury, but Finland in Sochi was without its top 3 centers...then again it's Finland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bear12Good
Regarding the coach selection: who cares? This team usually gets eliminated in the quarterfinals, Zhamnov cannot fail more than his predecessors. And whether he has been recommended for the job or actually appointed, doesn't matter.

What worries me is our situation down the middle with Kuzy out and Malkin recovering from injury, but Finland in Sochi was without its top 3 centers...then again it's Finland.
Agree.
 
By roster we're the 2nd best. Forwards are pretty close to Canada, goalies are simply the best by far, and defense is behind Canada, Sweden and USA, but the gap isn't that big. It's a pretty competent line and capable to do its job.

The main problem is coaching. With Znaroks we won't win anything.

if malkin, panarin and kuznetsov dont play, then russia dont have better forwards than canada, usa, finland and sweden.

Ovechkin - Grigorenko - Kucherov
Kaprizov - Shipachyov - Tarasenko
A,Svechnikov - Namnestikov - Radulov
Guryanov - Barbashyov - Buchnevich
Barabanov
 
if malkin, panarin and kuznetsov dont play, then russia dont have better forwards than canada, usa, finland and sweden.

Ovechkin - Grigorenko - Radulov
Kaprizov - Shipachyov - Tarasenko
Buchnevich - Namnestikov - A,Svechnikov
Guryanov - Barbashyov - Barabanov

What about Kucherov? And Panarin said, he wanted to play at the Olympics.
 
Well maybe then the wingers are better. But dont tell me that the russian centers are better than the centers canada usa, sweden and finland have if malkin and kuznetsov is out
Assuming everyone (Kuznetsov however unlikely, Malkin, Shipachyov) is there I would say they’re 3rd behind Canada and the USA. Shipachyov is a player for me who is of top 6 quality in the NHL, hence why I would have them above Finland or Sweden in that department
 
Assuming everyone (Kuznetsov however unlikely, Malkin, Shipachyov) is there I would say they’re 3rd behind Canada and the USA. Shipachyov is a player for me who is of top 6 quality in the NHL, hence why I would have them above Finland or Sweden in that department

He failed in Vegas. With your logic, Omark is top 6 quality in NHL. Shipa would not make Sweden or Finland.

Shipa-grigorenko-namnestikov-barbashev is not better center-line than barkov-aho-hintz-kotkanemi and zibanejad-pettersson-backström-william karlsson
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy and Boonk
Assuming everyone (Kuznetsov however unlikely, Malkin, Shipachyov) is there I would say they’re 3rd behind Canada and the USA
That's if we disregard the fact that neither Malkin nor Kuznetsov has been particularly good recently.

He failed in Vegas.
That's only true if you define walking away as a failure. The difference between his situation and Omark's, who spent years and years trying to hang in in the NHL, is huge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Buchnevich
In scouring my brain to come up with some kind of valid justification for naming Zhamnov coach of the Olympic team, the most prestigious of all sports venues, the only thing I could come up with is that Zhamnov had an NHL background, which might, in the most far-fetched sense, give him some kind of connection with the NHL stars on the team. But if you don't accept that super-reach, I have nothing left to offer.
 
Malkin has only been declared out for 2 months. He is on track to be back well before the Olympics, and will play barring any major setbacks in his training.
The statement was Malkin will miss the first two months of the season at least. It won't be surprising if he doesn't play in the Olympics.
 
The statement was Malkin will miss the first two months of the season at least. It won't be surprising if he doesn't play in the Olympics.

That would certainly be a surprise. Out two months means a return date of Dec 12th. The Olympics are in February. Even if Malkin misses an extra 6-8 weeks on top of those two months, he will still make it back in time for the Olympics.
 
That would certainly be a surprise. Out two months means a return date of Dec 12th. The Olympics are in February. Even if Malkin misses an extra 6-8 weeks on top of those two months, he will still make it back in time for the Olympics.
If Malkin doesn't play in the Olympics it won't be surprising.
 
He failed in Vegas. With your logic, Omark is top 6 quality in NHL. Shipa would not make Sweden or Finland.

Shipa-grigorenko-namnestikov-barbashev is not better center-line than barkov-aho-hintz-kotkanemi and zibanejad-pettersson-backström-william karlsson
"Ship" good player on big ice. But OG22 wiil play in nhl ice?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad