FiLe
Mr. Know-It-Nothing
- Oct 9, 2009
- 7,045
- 1,438
You should ask your missus, methinks. If she says "no", try giving flowers, backrubs and spontaneous compliments.is pillu still active?
You should ask your missus, methinks. If she says "no", try giving flowers, backrubs and spontaneous compliments.is pillu still active?
is pillu still active?
So when is the final roster going to be announced?![]()
Definitely not the first suggestion. Lundell was considered a strong candidate for the center, but it could have as well been Haula, Luostarinen, or even Lammikko. For wings, two out of Armia, Lehkonen, Kapanen, Donskoi, Kiviranta.Kotkaniemi - Lundell - Kakko - ish
OR
Donskoi - Haula - Armia - ish
What would Team Finland (fourth line) have looked like in the olympic given NHL players: (say Hintz-Barkov-Rantanen - TT-Aho-X - Laine-Granlund-Kapanen - see below
Kotkaniemi - Lundell - Kakko - ish
OR
Donskoi - Haula - Armia - ish
That is you skip Puljujärvi and Lundell in favor of players with a little more experience. At least in the starting crew.
Maybe the prospect page?I don't know where I should write this report, so I'll try it here. Brad Lambert terminated the contract with JYP on his own initiative, they mutually agreed at the end of the contract and is thus a free agent. Is there a chance he will stay in Finland and agree on a contract by another Liiga team by the end of the season or go to Canada? And how big a role can his father play in this? Thanks for any answers.
Maybe the prospect page?![]()
Tuohimaa is an odd choice but for the 3rd spot they probably just asked around whoever wants to go.
Yeah but there is also Metsola, Ortio, Juvonen, Kaskisuo, etc.As Finnish league is not taking a break during the Olympics it would't make sense to have a team to lose a goalie who is just sitting in the stands for two weeks.
Apart from Metsola - whose status has been exhaustively covered in this thread - none of those can be considered an upgrade over Tuohimaa. (I'm not calling them notable downgrades either, though.)Yeah but there is also Metsola, Ortio, Juvonen, Kaskisuo, etc.
Well, I for one would definitely be more confident with Ortio in goal than Tuohimaa but for a 3rd goalie it largely doesn't matter, like I said I think it's far more important to select the guy who is happy to be there.Apart from Metsola - whose status has been exhaustively covered in this thread - none of those can be considered an upgrade over Tuohimaa. (I'm not calling them notable downgrades either, though.)
It's a quite sound prediction otherwise, but I'd say it's quite likely that Jalonen won't give up his habit of picking a fifth natural center into the team - so one of the two extra spots will go to Kemppainen/Tyrväinen/Ruohomaa.Granlund - Manninen - Hartikainen
Pesonen - Aaltonen - Ojamäki
Rajala - Filppula(A) - Pakarinen
Komarov - Björninen - Anttila(C)
Innala, Savinainen.
For what it's worth, I think Kemppainen will make it. He has no business entering the lineup over the four centers SantosHalper penciled in, but he's an ideal extra piece. He doesn't dazzle anybody, but he's a solid utility guy you can insert into any line if there comes a need to plug a hole.Komarov and Anttila definitely don't merit being there over Kemppainen but I guess intangibles and whatnot.
Isn't it a matter of perception though? When he left Ufa most people saw Manninen as a downgrade. Aaltonen couldn't carve himself a role in SKA while Kemppainen has been [successfully] playing there for years. He just doesn't get the hype because he is not the first-line player per se.For what it's worth, I think Kemppainen will make it. He has no business entering the lineup over the four centers SantosHalper penciled in, but he's an ideal extra piece. He doesn't dazzle anybody, but he's a solid utility guy you can insert into any line if there comes a need to plug a hole.
The primary criteria for selection for the players in Europe is not their KHL (or any other league) record - it's their national team record. Most players in this lineup have proven their mettle in the EHT, WCs, and other NT events over the last few years. And as long as they keep doing good in the NT, the coach keeps picking them over guys with more impressive club team records - unless their overall records start indicating that they've completely fallen off the cliff.Just doesn't make sense.
Very likely. My prediction was that because Granlund, Savinainen have some center background and Pakarinen, Anttila has taken faceoffs almost regularly. Jalonen would not pick a extra center.It's a quite sound prediction otherwise, but I'd say it's quite likely that Jalonen won't give up his habit of picking a fifth natural center into the team - so one of the two extra spots will go to Kemppainen/Tyrväinen/Ruohomaa.
Has Manninen been a downgrade? 3 highest scoring players for Ufa last year and Granlund&Manninen are highest scoring players for Ufa right now. I don't watch KHL but it seems to me, it's a top-3 line in KHL. No point to break that line, especially how they dominated in Channel one cup.Isn't it a matter of perception though? When he left Ufa most people saw Manninen as a downgrade. Aaltonen couldn't carve himself a role in SKA while Kemppainen has been [successfully] playing there for years. He just doesn't get the hype because he is not the first-line player per se.
Honestly, I would pick him over half the guys on that listed team without even thinking about it. KHL failure Pesonen? Perennial grinders in Savinainen and Pakarinen? While Kemppainen gets ditched? Komarov and Anttila, we already covered. Just doesn't make sense.