jvr32
Registered User
- Oct 24, 2016
- 998
- 680
I agree to a degree. Kuokkanen is more like an ideal #2C more than a #1C, a role he's playing now. I'm not sure if you can count on him producing in tough situations. Also his puck distribution game has never impressed me. And Ikonen shows a lot of same signs that typical perimeter players show, he's afraid of going to tough areas and his skating is bad and not fast in a straight line as well, just look at how Victor Mete blew past him purely with his skating despite both not having a long shift in the first game. Räsänen has never had impressive offensive numbers outside international junior tournaments, and that might finally show up in this tournament.In my opinion the biggest problem was center-play. Especially Kuokkanen and Ikonen failed miserably. I would move Räsänen to the 1st line, Kuokkanen to 2nd and Ikonen 3rd. If Ikonen can't do better, you may have to try Kupari at C.
So most concerned I'm about the middle 6 forwards. I don't see a lot of potential to produce there. Especially with Ikonen, Kupari and Innala in. Maybe Ahokas should shuffle the lines already, but his options are limited, and it's his own fault. I'd move Heponiemi to the first line to the place of Vesalainen, not that he's bad but his style would be better alongside Ikonen, him and Koivula would do the dirty work in the second line. I can't help but think that the someone from the omissions of Turkulainen, Somppi, Luostarinen and Kotkaniemi were a big mistake and it will show on the scoreboard this tournament. Not in the next game against Denmark though. The coach's stuck-up style favoring his guys will bite him in the ass.