Hockeyisl1fe
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2016
- 2,368
- 793
....Without his idiotic penalty Denmark wouldn't have even scored a goal.
Thanks a lot indeed.
....Without his idiotic penalty Denmark wouldn't have even scored a goal.
Thanks a lot indeed.
LOL
He has the best transition numbers of any d-man on Finland through 2 games.
Plus his entry denials are second best
Plus his primary shot contributions 5 on 5 are really solid.
Yeah Rasanen is the answer to the teams scoring woes... lol. The defense have been fine, forwards need to be way better. Hilarious you think he should be put on first pair with Heiskanen when he hasn't even gotten a sniff from the coaching staff. I love his game but he's not cracking the top 6.We desperatly need ERäsänen.
Our top 6 D should be:
Heiskanen-ERäsänen
Välimäki-Jokiharju
Juolevi has been horrible,can't pass,can't skate,
hasn't done anything right.
I agree. Our defense is not the problem, forwards are. We have good enough first and second pair.Yeah Rasanen is the answer to the teams scoring woes... lol. The defense have been fine, forwards need to be way better. Hilarious you think he should be put on first pair with Heiskanen when he hasn't even gotten a sniff from the coaching staff. I love his game but he's not cracking the top 6.
Those look solid. I think Juolevi Jokiharju and Tolvanen will work magic up high. Vesalainen in the middle and Rasanen down low. Really want Tolvanen to heat up and I think this is a unit that could do it.Lineup at practice:
Vesalainen - Kuokkanen - Tolvanen
Heponiemi - Ikonen - Koivula
Innala - Räsänen - Tuulola
Jääskä - Koppanen - Nurmi
PP units:
1. Tolvanen - Räsänen - Vesalainen - Juolevi - Jokiharju
2. Heponiemi - Ikonen - Koivula - Kuokkanen - Heiskanen
Looks like Ahokas listened to me. (As if.)
Yay, that came true... except that Innala is still in the line-up. Good news still.And why isn't Tuulola playing? He is a kind of winger this team badly needs: plays hard and goes to the net. Why someone like Innala is playing instead of him ffs? He provides nothing to this team.
Lol, why on earth is Innala playing over Kupari? Not that Kupari has been good but Innala has been way worse.
I think the answer is pretty simple. Kupari is the only forward in the lineup who doesn't feature in any special teams. Innala does PK.Yay, that came true... except that Innala is still in the line-up. Good news still.
Yeah, but couldn't he have just replaced Innala in that role? Tuulola is capable of playing pk and it's not like it's been good anyways.I think the answer is pretty simple. Kupari is the only forward in the lineup who doesn't feature in any special teams. Innala does PK.
Um, sorry, please clarify. Do you mean Kupari or Tuulola should replace Innala in the role? If Kupari was an adequate PKer, he obviously would be doing it already. If you're talking about Tuulola, then yeah, he can PK too, and probably will, so that number would still be the same as it is now.Yeah, but couldn't he have just replaced Innala in that role? Tuulola is capable of playing pk and it's not like it's been good anyways.
I was talking about Tuulola. I agree that Kupari isn't really that strong along the boards, but he still brings some skill and speed to that line. But like I said in one of my posts: cutting Luostarinen was imo a big mistake. Some were outraged by Ahokas cutting complimentary wingers like Turkulainen and Kotkaniemi, but I can't seriously understand cutting a strong 2way center that we lack currently in the top 9. Kuokkanen/Luostarinen/Tuulola (moving Räsänen to play with Vesalainen and Tolvanen) would be a much better 3rd line than we currently are capable of building.Um, sorry, please clarify. Do you mean Kupari or Tuulola should replace Innala in the role? If Kupari was an adequate PKer, he obviously would be doing it already. If you're talking about Tuulola, then yeah, he can PK too, and probably will, so that number would still be the same as it is now.
But looks like Ahokas thinks it's better to raise their number by one. Not to mention Innala hasn't been *bad*. He's simply been rather nondescript. Additionally, while Innala has been pretty lukewarm overall, he is - and has been here too - quite good in corners. He sure can dig those deep pucks. Sometimes coaches think of little things like these when they go over the internal rolings of a line, instead of simply figuring who's the better player overall. Some might call it micromanagement, and maybe it is, but... coaches are funny like that. You know.
TOIs might be a concern. In the first two games, our first line has averaged 20 minutes per man. Vesalainen especially has been a workhorse, ~21m on both games. Kuokkanen just shy of 20 minutes. On top of this load, you want to add PK duty?Lets not try focus on the offence but instead get more "role" players as if we didn't have enough. There are guys who can PK as well as play PP (Vesalainen & Kuokkanen for instance) so it's not like Ahokas was running out of options either way.
TOIs might be a concern. In the first two games, our first line has averaged 20 minutes per man. Vesalainen especially has been a workhorse, ~21m on both games. Kuokkanen just shy of 20 minutes. On top of this load, you want to add PK duty?
Just another aspect to consider with a top-heavy team like this. 1st line plays 20 minutes as it is, the 2nd plays 17-18 minutes, and the 3rd and 4th lines share the rest. It's exactly the scenario where you're looking to add a PK specialist even if you do have some adequate guys on the top-six.