NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
But like every major European city is a tourist destination and the tournament is always in Europe. Hasn't seemed to help lol.
They seem to do better when it’s Germany or Prague as opposed to the Baltics.
But like every major European city is a tourist destination and the tournament is always in Europe. Hasn't seemed to help lol.
Yeah spring in Prague is probably a lot more appealing for young women than Riga.They seem to do better when it’s Germany or Prague as opposed to the Baltics.
If the tournament were occasionally held in Canada it would probably make a difference with regards to participation.It being on during the NHL playoffs sure doesn't help either.
More and more players really aren't going. Usually getting guys with something to prove more than anything.
NHL season also takes a toll on a lot of these guys and they rather take some time off before they start their training for the summer.
This is definitely an interesting idea.After the loss in Athens, which followed an embarassing 6th place showing at the World Championships on U.S. soil, I remember USA Basketball implemented a system where players made a 3-year commitment and there was a pool of players, around 40 or so that were part of the "program" so speak to draw players from for tournaments with the eye towards the Beijing Olympics. Some older players opted not to partake while younger players like LeBron, Kobe and DWade committed. This system remained in place for 15 years or so and yielded the kind of results USA Basketball would expect based on the level of talent in the country, but unfortunately, due again to a system where players don't really want to commit, they had to scrap that recently, and I wouldn't be surprised if they lost in the upcoming Paris 2024 Olympics (especially with France naturalizing Embiid), and who knows maybe the cycle will repeat itself again.
The idea though is one that I like, and one I think USA and Canada should at least consider. Get 65-70 players or so that say they want to be "in" and part of the senior national team program. Announce that this is the pool from which players will be selected for future tournaments, including the Olympics. Obviously if you're injured or in the Playoffs, you won't go to the World Championships, but if you're otherwise relatively healthy and your team is out, the expectation is that you'll show up for international duty. Players can get added and back out of the program, but it's either a "you're in" or "you're out" kind of deal. As of right now, it just seems like the pool is anyone that played in Junior competition or really just anyone with the right nationality in general. No real sense of commitment or belonging to a "team" or overall program. So you get rosters that are just hodge-podge, a few guys that answer the call repeatedly but mostly just an amalgamation of whomever says "yeah, sure" each time.
After the loss in Athens, which followed an embarassing 6th place showing at the World Championships on U.S. soil, I remember USA Basketball implemented a system where players made a 3-year commitment and there was a pool of players, around 40 or so that were part of the "program" so speak to draw players from for tournaments with the eye towards the Beijing Olympics. Some older players opted not to partake while younger players like LeBron, Kobe and DWade committed. This system remained in place for 15 years or so and yielded the kind of results USA Basketball would expect based on the level of talent in the country, but unfortunately, due again to a system where players don't really want to commit, they had to scrap that recently, and I wouldn't be surprised if they lost in the upcoming Paris 2024 Olympics (especially with France naturalizing Embiid), and who knows maybe the cycle will repeat itself again.
The idea though is one that I like, and one I think USA and Canada should at least consider. Get 65-70 players or so that say they want to be "in" and part of the senior national team program. Announce that this is the pool from which players will be selected for future tournaments, including the Olympics. Obviously if you're injured or in the Playoffs, you won't go to the World Championships, but if you're otherwise relatively healthy and your team is out, the expectation is that you'll show up for international duty. Players can get added and back out of the program, but it's either a "you're in" or "you're out" kind of deal. As of right now, it just seems like the pool is anyone that played in Junior competition or really just anyone with the right nationality in general. No real sense of commitment or belonging to a "team" or overall program. So you get rosters that are just hodge-podge, a few guys that answer the call repeatedly but mostly just an amalgamation of whomever says "yeah, sure" each time.
tbh I think injuries play a decent part as well as the kind of "power of one" and the location.
Kane is injured. Draisaitl is likely nursing several injuries (I guess you saw the axe chop). Drai came in 2017 (albeit to his hometown) immediately after getting bounced by Anaheim. Maybe Marner is injured?
"power of one" is kind of like if 1 star or group of good pros from 1 team came it would have a domino effect. Crosby nor any other star or group really committed this year, it's a wasteland.
Location
Look at the 2017 Roster (&/or USA) . This was in Cologne, Germany & Paris, France. Much more populous and prestigious cities in the heart of Europe.
Oh yeah, there also wasn't a war nearby in those days. Latvia and Finland border Russia. This is no small thing.
It's still hard for me to grasp the mentality of the players/wives/girlfriends. Sure, Tampere and Riga are not Paris but they are still thoroughly modern/interesting places where I am sure there is plenty enough to do and see.You go and mingle with the locals,see the sights,etc,etc,etc, what's not to like? In the case of a Canadian player/significant other it's most likely some guy or gal from Brooks Alberta or someplace, why wouldn't they want to go and experience these places when given a chance? especially the gals...............they ain't paying for the trip!!I agree about injuries, and NHL players generally not wanting to risk their off-season regime.
Riga and Tampere are not on par with Paris as attractions, for sure, but they are rather nice cities, especially at this time of the year. I'm hauling from Helsinki and it's full summer outside. While you probably have a point there about destinations that North Americans really are interested in seeing.
The war, then, just isn't visible in any meaningful way outside the news. The participation of Latvia and Finland is through military and humanitarian aid, including voluntary collection and sending, and sanctions, and that's it. In everyday life nobody here seems to be concerned about it because what would be the use? (Not that we don't care. It's just there's precious little an individual can do about it.) It is actually a very small thing in practise. Tourism is picking up just the same as it did a couple of years ago when the pandemic era travel restrictions were lifted.
Just adding some more detail to your comment, basically.
It's very much about perceptions... Well, it's no big surprise that Paris or Prague or Berlin simply are better known than Riga, let alone Tampere. (Riga does has a superb Medieval old town and a metropolitan feel to the city. A century ago it was actually nicknamed "Little Paris" by the jetset aristocracy back then. Tampere is basically a nice lakeside town but doesn't have that kind of sightseeing or historic pedigree.)It's still hard for me to grasp the mentality of the players/wives/girlfriends. Sure, Tampere and Riga are not Paris but they are still thoroughly modern/interesting places where I am sure there is plenty enough to do and see.You go and mingle with the locals,see the sights,etc,etc,etc, what's not to like? In the case of a Canadian player/significant other it's most likely some guy or gal from Brooks Alberta or someplace, why wouldn't they want to go and experience these places when given a chance? especially the gals...............they ain't paying for the trip!!
Growing up it was a big thing if we went on a family trip to Quebec!! I would have been ecstatic to go overseas to Europe.
I just don't get, I really don't.
I guess i'm just a different person, what I would love about going to those places (much what i loved about Quebec)..............was the different atmosphere then what I had always known. The talk in the cafes and restaurants in a language I didn't know, seeing how the locals went about their business which was different then down home, seeing new landscapes, talking with people and asking them questions about the area, experiencing the different traditions. But I'm the type of guy who regularly watches Rick Steeves Europe on t.v.It's very much about perceptions... Well, it's no big surprise that Paris or Prague or Berlin simply are better known than Riga, let alone Tampere. (Riga does has a superb Medieval old town and a metropolitan feel to the city. A century ago it was actually nicknamed "Little Paris" by the jetset aristocracy back then. Tampere is basically a nice lakeside town but doesn't have that kind of sightseeing or historic pedigree.)
I wonder how many on the team have kids. Going to those places might be nice... but... you've just spent the last 8 months going through the grind and travel of the NHL season. Then you want to tack on an extra 3 weeks (it's not a short tournament) in some other country still playing hockey? I can see doing it if you're single or you have a somewhat adventurous wife/girlfriend and no kids. With kids, however... nope. If you have kids you need a totally different kind of "vacation". Or if you do have kids, they're staying home.It's still hard for me to grasp the mentality of the players/wives/girlfriends. Sure, Tampere and Riga are not Paris but they are still thoroughly modern/interesting places where I am sure there is plenty enough to do and see.You go and mingle with the locals,see the sights,etc,etc,etc, what's not to like? In the case of a Canadian player/significant other it's most likely some guy or gal from Brooks Alberta or someplace, why wouldn't they want to go and experience these places when given a chance? especially the gals...............they ain't paying for the trip!!
Growing up it was a big thing if we went on a family trip to Quebec!! I would have been ecstatic to go overseas to Europe.
I just don't get it, I really don't.
I can understand that.I wonder how many on the team have kids. Going to those places might be nice... but... you've just spent the last 8 months going through the grind and travel of the NHL season. Then you want to tack on an extra 3 weeks (it's not a short tournament) in some other country still playing hockey? I can see doing it if you're single or you have a somewhat adventurous wife/girlfriend and no kids. With kids, however... nope. If you have kids you need a totally different kind of "vacation". Or if you do have kids, they're staying home.
Lucic and Myers have kids. I'm not sure how many others on the roster would. Probably a few, not many?
![]()
Tough to say. Seems like the past bunch of years players are using the World Championship as an opportunity for a holiday too.If the tournament were occasionally held in Canada it would probably make a difference with regards to participation.
Don't think it would matter.After the loss in Athens, which followed an embarassing 6th place showing at the World Championships on U.S. soil, I remember USA Basketball implemented a system where players made a 3-year commitment and there was a pool of players, around 40 or so that were part of the "program" so speak to draw players from for tournaments with the eye towards the Beijing Olympics. Some older players opted not to partake while younger players like LeBron, Kobe and DWade committed. This system remained in place for 15 years or so and yielded the kind of results USA Basketball would expect based on the level of talent in the country, but unfortunately, due again to a system where players don't really want to commit, they had to scrap that recently, and I wouldn't be surprised if they lost in the upcoming Paris 2024 Olympics (especially with France naturalizing Embiid), and who knows maybe the cycle will repeat itself again.
The idea though is one that I like, and one I think USA and Canada should at least consider. Get 65-70 players or so that say they want to be "in" and part of the senior national team program. Announce that this is the pool from which players will be selected for future tournaments, including the Olympics. Obviously if you're injured or in the Playoffs, you won't go to the World Championships, but if you're otherwise relatively healthy and your team is out, the expectation is that you'll show up for international duty. Players can get added and back out of the program, but it's either a "you're in" or "you're out" kind of deal. As of right now, it just seems like the pool is anyone that played in Junior competition or really just anyone with the right nationality in general. No real sense of commitment or belonging to a "team" or overall program. So you get rosters that are just hodge-podge, a few guys that answer the call repeatedly but mostly just an amalgamation of whomever says "yeah, sure" each time.
Not a ton of talent up front but defensively very sound.Lots to be proud of in this group.
You nailed it!@Czechboy what did I tell you before the WJHC regarding Connor Bedard? Was I right or was I right?
What did I tell you about Adam Fantilli before this WHC? Was I right or was I right? God damn it's hard being so right all the time.
although, my expectations for Adam was 4 pts. 2 goals 2 assists in 10 games. He has two games left with which to meet my rather modest expectations. Hopefully he can chip in with an important goal in the semis or hopefully the final.
But God Damn! Do I know players.![]()