If we got Carlsson at 4 and Honzek at 26, we’d have the Golden Gate Bridge line. Coining it now.
Perhaps if we do trade EK at the draftHonzek doesn't seem likely to last to 26. Aggressive projections have him maybe in play as early as 8 or 9, most things I've seen figure he's gone somewhere in the teens.
So my dream is mostly dead but I'm going to hang onto it for as long as I can.
Just spit balling, is there a fit with EK to Vancouver at 11 Or STL at 10?Perhaps if we do trade EK at the draft
We get Carlsson and Michkov falls to 25-26 and we get him too and then we bask in our future glory
A DA DA DA!I think it’ll be
Michkov at 4 and Simashev at 26 .
I highly doubt he slides this far but we get But at 36
View attachment 707725
Wait there’s a risk??? Oh no….no wonder he’s not going 2nd or 3rd! Thanks for the INCREDIBLE INSIGHT!!!!I really hope it won't be Michkov but Smith or Carlsson. I am not sure if you guys do not realize but risk is very high. I mean his skills are not the issue but all the other stuff. If he would have 3 year contract for lets say in Switzerland I would not have as much concerns. But I have said this already so my opinion is probably already quite clear.
Meh. If he's the consensus BPA, he needs to be the pick. You go BPA at that position.I really hope it won't be Michkov but Smith or Carlsson. I am not sure if you guys do not realize but risk is very high. I mean his skills are not the issue but all the other stuff. If he would have 3 year contract for lets say in Switzerland I would not have as much concerns. But I have said this already so my opinion is probably already quite clear.
Just based on Griers quotes post Lottery, I get the feeling he’s prepared to take the BPA between Carlsson and Michkov. No disrespect to Smith but imo this is a 2 man pool at #4. I’ve been kinda thinking lately, it’s very unlikely, but what if Anaheim goes Carlsson at #2 and CBJ goes Michkov at 3? Is there a universe where that happens Lol? Fantilli at #4 seems far fetched but I guess it possibly COULD happen.Meh. If he's the consensus BPA, he needs to be the pick. You go BPA at that position.
Just based on Griers quotes post Lottery, I get the feeling he’s prepared to take the BPA between Carlsson and Michkov. No disrespect to Smith but imo this is a 2 man pool at #4. I’ve been kinda thinking lately, it’s very unlikely, but what if Anaheim goes Carlsson at #2 and CBJ goes Michkov at 3? Is there a universe where that happens Lol? Fantilli at #4 seems far fetched but I guess it possibly COULD happen.
None of those guys are going to be there past like 15.And with the Sharks 2nd (1st rd pick from NJD) at #25 or 26 overall. I'd the Sharks to take Mathew Wood 6'3" and he has a booming shot like Ovechin from the same left circle where Ovechin is famous for. Or maybe Gabe Perreault 5'11" but at #25 it is hard to see he still available for the Sharks. Maybe the Sharks can trade NJD 1st and Sharks 2nd round to move up a 10 spots to grab Ryan Leonard (USA).
Your post is absolutely zero value post.Wait there’s a risk??? Oh no….no wonder he’s not going 2nd or 3rd! Thanks for the INCREDIBLE INSIGHT!!!!
/s
I mean, there’s a chance Anaheim takes him at 2. Slight, but it’s still there since they already have Zegras and McTavish at C.Your post is absolutely zero value post.
The risks are related to stuff which are larger scale things than just hockey. I cannot blame you as you live in North America that you are probably not following the situation as much.
Also, if Michkov really is that good, shouldn't he go already 2nd or 3rd overall if there would not be that big risk?
Meh. If he's the consensus BPA, he needs to be the pick. You go BPA at that position.