Michoulicious
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2014
- 7,508
- 8,246
Negotiation tactics ... Tampa Bat was robbed with Savard, Coleman, Goodrow, when they traded Miller for a 1st.... Or maybe they have a coherent plan of action. Think any team would accept to be robbed like TBL supposedly was...That means Chicago robbed Tampa Bay.
Yzerman....come on.Negotiation tactics ... Tampa Bat was robbed with Savard, Coleman, Goodrow, when they traded Miller for a 1st.... Or maybe they have a coherent plan of action. Think any team would accept to be robbed like TBL supposedly was...
No, this means Tampa front office sees an area of need, pinpoints the best player possible and gets him. Paying a premium? Maybe, but for what Hagel contract is worth I'd definitely not call this trade a robbery for Chicago.That means Chicago robbed Tampa Bay.
They aren’t trading for a 17 minute a night guy with 22% shooting percentage.Lol. Lost in all this is they traded two firsts (regardless of whether or not you believe they’re over-valued on here) which never happens for far better talents than Hagel. This player is having an absurd outlier of a season that will not continue guaranteed and will certainly not have the opportunity in Tampa he had in Chicago.
Hagel gonna get first line ice time like he does in Chicago? First unit PP? Is he gonna be one of the guys on the ice when you’re down 1 late in the third with the goalie pulled?
Just an absolutely bizarre decision to trade that much for a guy who will not be the reason you win the cup. At the end of the day it’ll come down to their key players performing when it matters most and staying healthy.
Sure, let’s entertain for whatever reason Hagel still gets 17:30 of ice time in Tampa including first unit PP, and still shoots at 22%. I guess Tampa wins. Something tells me neither of these things will be true.
Does winning the cup make it worth it? Obviously. That doesn’t change the fact that the trade is an overpayment.
That means Chicago robbed Tampa Bay.
Players like Coleman and Goodrow were absolutely reasons Tampa won the Cup the past two seasons. They were difference makers the Lightning needed along with their core and Vasilevskiy.Lol. Lost in all this is they traded two firsts (regardless of whether or not you believe they’re over-valued on here) which never happens for far better talents than Hagel. This player is having an absurd outlier of a season that will not continue guaranteed and will certainly not have the opportunity in Tampa he had in Chicago.
Hagel gonna get first line ice time like he does in Chicago? First unit PP? Is he gonna be one of the guys on the ice when you’re down 1 late in the third with the goalie pulled?
Just an absolutely bizarre decision to trade that much for a guy who will not be the reason you win the cup. At the end of the day it’ll come down to their key players performing when it matters most and staying healthy.
Sure, let’s entertain for whatever reason Hagel still gets 17:30 of ice time in Tampa including first unit PP, and still shoots at 22%. I guess Tampa wins. Something tells me neither of these things will be true.
Does winning the cup make it worth it? Obviously. That doesn’t change the fact that the trade is an overpayment.
What about back to back cups and going for a 3peat?Ask any gm in the league if they’d trade 5 1st’s for a Cup and the answer would be an unequivocal yes.
Getting players to win cups and go for more cups when the core window is closing year by year is smart asset management.Negotiation tactics ... Tampa Bat was robbed with Savard, Coleman, Goodrow, when they traded Miller for a 1st.... Or maybe they have a coherent plan of action. Think any team would accept to be robbed like TBL supposedly was...