JohnHodgson
Registered User
- May 6, 2009
- 4,153
- 1,542
Two roster players and two picks doesn't start the convo lmao
Two useful roster players.
Katchouk and Raddysh are basically salary dumps at this point in time.
Two roster players and two picks doesn't start the convo lmao
its like bailing a boat with a bucket with holes in it, yeah you can tread for a bit, but it'll catch up, but its the price you play to be a contender. Tampa is going #3. what happens in 5 years isn't really being thought of right now.This is right in line with BriseBois' strategy of acquiring hard-working players with low cap hit and still term left on their contracts (Coleman, Goodrow) but they're paying quite the price to do so. Has worked out pretty well so far though.
The cap hit's key. It's not just the player they acquired, it's the cost for said player that's the bonus.This was one helluva haul for Chicago; but man, 1.5M for three years; Tampa just keeps chugging along. They'll lose more players this offseason but these types of moves are wise. Tampa has a window open for at least 3-5 more seasons.
Difference is HAGS is on a great contract for two years at 1.5 million and the lightning are going for two more cups so you are picking last again or near the bottom. JBB doesn't play around and is going all in with this core of Stamkos, Kucherov, Point, Hedman, McD, Sergachev, Cernak, and Vasy. Realistically we probably lose Palat or trade Kilhorn for cap reasons unless Palat takes a massive discount. WE got a 23 year old that is producing on a terrible team on a great contract.Eichel. Not even close.
Exactly.
Not to sound pretentious, but fans of teams that haven't won a cup in a while have a very different mindset than fans of teams that have won a cup or more in a short period. Suddenly it's not about climbing the mountain, it's about planting a flag and claiming that mountain for yourself. It's about setting a historical standard for an era. If you have a chance to distance yourself as the pre-imminent hockey power for the cap era in the history books, you are happy to pay a premium to increase your odds to do so.
I know the Sharks are irrelevant, but at least try to act like you know what you're talking about.The Hawks got 2 1sts for some nobody. That's pretty impressive.
Sellers market for low AAVs. Buyers market for high AAVs.
Late 1st rounders have around 20% odds of becoming NHL players. Early 4rth rounders have like 12% odds of becoming NHL players.That's a massive downgrade. Best case scenario you downgrade 65+ spots, Hagel is a good player but this is quite easily an over payment, and a massive over payment at that. If they win the cup I'm sure Bolts fans won't care about it, they might not even care right now considering they won 2 in a row, but looking at this trade objectively it is 100% a huge over payment. One 1st should have got it done.
Isn't it always...
I know the Sharks are irrelevant, but at least try to act like you know what you're talking about.
He's good. Really good.8th in NHL scoring, plays C/W, plays in all situations, fast, big, physical.
How many 20 goal scorers at 23years old do you get for 1.5 million for three playoff runs and RFA after that? The difference between TAMPA and Toronto is our GMS don't give ridiculous contracts to chokers . JBB/Yzerman give out smart contracts and make smart trades that are for the current and future.It's tough to be critical of Tampa Bay given their recent success, but that's a very steep price to pay for Hagel under the circumstances.
You can't deny though that this trade seems like a massive overpayment.How many 20 goal scorers at 23years old do you get for 1.5 million for three playoff runs and RFA after that? The difference between TAMPA and Toronto is our GMS don't give ridiculous contracts to chokers . JBB/Yzerman give out smart contracts and make smart trades that are for the current and future.