VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 27,456
- 14,554
If by a long time you mean eight or nine months sureThis may be the last tank thread we see in a long time
If by a long time you mean eight or nine months sureThis may be the last tank thread we see in a long time
So what do you suggest they do here? Bench the stars? It is ridiculous to do that. We were never getting Bedard. There will be a good player available wherever they pick this year. The non-athletes here have no idea how competition works.
No, making the playoffs next year should be a gimme because other team falling backIf by a long time you mean eight or nine months sure
The annual Canucks hot streak building for next year(but they’ll fall flat on their faces and go 0-8 to start) draft position ruining in full effect
They were speculating on the post-game radio show, that some Canuck fans are still having Jim Benning PTSD flashbacks. A late season winning streak disappears into a mirage at the start of next season just like 'Groundhog Day'.The annual Canucks hot streak building for next year(but they’ll fall flat on their faces and go 0-8 to start) draft position ruining in full effect
So what do you suggest they do here? Bench the stars? It is ridiculous to do that. We were never getting Bedard. There will be a good player available wherever they pick this year. The non-athletes here have no idea how competition works.
I mean we all thought that with bruce too, so I’m skepticalThey were speculating on the post-game radio show, that some Canuck fans are still having Jim Benning PTSD flashbacks. A late season winning streak disappears into a mirage at the start of next season just like 'Groundhog Day'.
Is there any reason to think this edition of the Canucks will be any different? Well, I guess all you can hope for is that the current front office is light years ahead of the steaming pile of Benning-Weisbrod.
I think there's building evidence this win-streak just might be sustainable next season.
We cannot play the kids while we are trying to make the playoffs.Playing Podkolzin and Kravtsov under 9 mins is criminal this time of the year.
So he could increase Pettersson, Miller, Hughes, Boeser ice time.Pod and Krav playing under 9min, Demko playing 5 of the last 6.
Why??
In a vacuum the payment for Hronek was fine. It's absolutely true that legitimate top 4 RHDs are very hard to come by. To me it's all about timing. I just think there are too many holes in the line-up and feel a longer term vision (involving holding on to picks) is necessary to finally get this club out of the doldrums. That's done by accumulating draft picks and younger assets, free up cap space, then make a series of deals from a position of strength.Is it bleeding picks if you are getting NHL assets back?
We are in agreement Benning bled assets... If Hronek is a top pairing dman, is this trade bleeding assets?
There is no time for a longer term vision..The time is now with EP and Hughes (and Demko) entering their prime years.In a vacuum the payment for Hronek was fine. It's absolutely true that legitimate top 4 RHDs are very hard to come by. To me it's all about timing. I just think there are too many holes in the line-up and feel a longer term vision (involving holding on to picks) is necessary to finally get this club out of the doldrums. That's done by accumulating draft picks and younger assets, free up cap space, then make a series of deals from a position of strength.
Now, things can change very quickly. Nobody could have expected that Kuzmenko would be signed, and would perform the way he has. What if they're able to get the same kind of amazing find with a defenseman. What if they're able to find that cap space and get a solid 3C through a series of transactions involving their plethora of wingers. A lot of things can happen to make the Hronek move look astute in hindsight. I just believe the safer way to do it is to build a foundation of strength then deal from that foundation. it's kinda a tortoise and hare situation. Be patient, take strong steps and in the end you'll win.
With respect PoM this take drives me nuts. There is always time for a long term vision. And that vision is always formed based on the current status. EP and Hughes entering their primes is completely irrelevant to whether the team is ready to be competitive. It's not even close. This team isn't just one player away from being competitive, it's 5 players and several ugly contracts away.There is no time for a longer term vision..The time is now with EP and Hughes (and Demko) entering their prime years.
Its shit ,or get off the pot time.
Pod and Krav playing under 9min, Demko playing 5 of the last 6.
Why??
Just heard Tochett say words to the effect that' Need to see if those guys can play well, if we go into double overtime' on am650So he could increase Pettersson, Miller, Hughes, Boeser ice time.
To teach them a lesson? They have 25 seconds to earn better ice time, that is one shift.
To suppress their next contract expectations?
To make himself look good winning games against bottom third of the league teams by playing the best players twice as much as these guys?
To sell "HOPE" for next year, "See this is a good team" so step up a buy, buy, buy!
As usual the bottom teams are starting to win more often even with these recent wins the Canucks are still within reach of finishing 27th or 28th. All they have to do is lose those 4 point games to the teams chasing them.
Pettersson, Miller and Hughes will wear down soon playing 22+ minutes a game especially Hughes at close to half the game. There will be a kid playing on a bottom feeder that will hammer one of them yet, with the added ice time the odds go up that they get smoked in one of these mean nothing but a lousy draft slot games
Has tocchet ever finished a season with a winning record? I would imagine that means a lot to himPod and Krav playing under 9min, Demko playing 5 of the last 6.
Why??