Proposal: Tanev to Toronto/Buffalo/Colorado
- Thread starter zcaptain
- Start date
So what exactly are the leafs giving up?
Buffalo likely declines and Colorado laughs and blocks the Canucks number
Jimmy Firecracker
They Fired Sheldon!
Toronto has to offer the prospect .....
Buffalo I think listens, maybe Vancouver adds
You might be right about Colorado
Man Bear Pig
Registered User
Toronto pays up gladly? No, no we don't. That 1st round pick alone may be worth more than Tanev by next June.
turkulad
Registered User
Hey OP... first, Vancouver doesn't want to, couldn't, nor should trade Tanev.
And second: MacKinnon??? Give your head a shake and run these through the Vancouver board before bringing them out there. That's just ludicrous.
And second: MacKinnon??? Give your head a shake and run these through the Vancouver board before bringing them out there. That's just ludicrous.
Leafs aren't trading future 1sts for a non-franchise player. There is no deal between Toronto and Vancouver for Tanev that realistically works. Here is the list of non-starters for the Leafs, unless we are getting a potential franchise #1 D in return. Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Rielly and our 2017 first (until we knowing roughly where we are picking, and then it still might have top 3 protection).
Man Bear Pig
Registered User
I don't think you understand how potentially bad the Leafs will likely be again. Tanev makes us better but he wouldn't suddenly vault us up in the standings. He's good but he's not that good.
Semantics
PUBLIC ENEMY #1
You think Toronto's going to give up essentially the same package they gave up for a 21 year old Kessel for a d-man who turns 27 in a couple months? Because we saw how well that went for the Leafs.
Unless by "top prospect" you mean a guy like Dermott. Because the big three aren't really prospects any more and are untouchable.
tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
Tanev could help us but to say he's worth a 1st +2nd + top prospect is insane
So you think he's worth a 1st + 2nd + Kapanen or 1st + 2nd + Lipsec
No, no he's not he's a good player but not a star that's the price you pay for a star
So you think he's worth a 1st + 2nd + Kapanen or 1st + 2nd + Lipsec
No, no he's not he's a good player but not a star that's the price you pay for a star
Nucks are not getting close to any of these deals for Tanev.
As a Leafs fan, I'd consider either JvR or Kadri straight up for Tanev, but certainly not 2017 1st + top prospect + 2018 2nd.
Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 43,051
- 9,237
define top prospect, because I literally wouldn't want to trade that first round pick, let alone a 2nd and a top prospect.
The other 2 are laughable.
The other 2 are laughable.
El_Loco_Avs
Registered User
Djp
Registered User
Buffalo hangs up the phone snd puts them on block.
Reinhardt alone is worth more than Tanev. Tanev is not a #1.
Reinhardt alone is worth more than Tanev. Tanev is not a #1.
Skip2myBordyloo
Stay the course
- Apr 7, 2010
- 10,800
- 402
Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 43,051
- 9,237
Dude, stop it with these quality/quality proposals, Canucks don't want your trash
lanceuppercut75
Registered User
Hell no.
COUNTER-OFFER #1
TOR 1ST (top 5 protected)
Brooks Laich (AHL cap dump UFA in summer)
Frank Corrado (throw in so we don't have 9 D)
for
Chris Tanev
COUNTER-OFFER #2
Same as above, but swap the 1st rounder for any Leafs prospect not named Matthews or Nylander or Marner, and also add in a 3rd rounder going to Vancouver.
You would decline Horvat, Demko, Boeser, Juolevi, Virtanen, Tanev, Hutton, 2017 1st for MacKinnon?
MacWinnon
Registered User
You would decline Horvat, Demko, Boeser, Juolevi, Virtanen, Tanev, Hutton, 2017 1st for MacKinnon?
Probably. I bet only 3 of those players even become regular NHLers vs MacKinnon who is looking like a top 20 skater this year.
snipes
How cold? I’m ice cold.
- Dec 28, 2015
- 55,860
- 64,480
If Caggiula was healthy (and we confirmed he's a legit 3C in the NHL), and VAN weren't in the same division:
Nuge
for
Tanev
Nuge is a Vancouver kid and a massive upgrade at the #2 centre spot for VAN, eventual #1C. Centre and Dmen carry roughly equivalent value. I watch VAN a lot, I know how good of a defensive Dman Tanev is.
Klefbom-Larsson
Sekera-Tanev
Nurse-Russell
Davidson potentially in for Nurse when healthy. That's a lethal top 4, we would still have McDavid-Drai-Caggiula down the middle. However, with Caggiula injured (need to confirm he's a legit 3C) and VAN in division, doubt any trade gets made.
Nuge for Tanev is probably the fairest objective value I think.
Nuge
for
Tanev
Nuge is a Vancouver kid and a massive upgrade at the #2 centre spot for VAN, eventual #1C. Centre and Dmen carry roughly equivalent value. I watch VAN a lot, I know how good of a defensive Dman Tanev is.
Klefbom-Larsson
Sekera-Tanev
Nurse-Russell
Davidson potentially in for Nurse when healthy. That's a lethal top 4, we would still have McDavid-Drai-Caggiula down the middle. However, with Caggiula injured (need to confirm he's a legit 3C) and VAN in division, doubt any trade gets made.
Nuge for Tanev is probably the fairest objective value I think.
