Toggle sidebar

Friedman: Tampa have inquired about Tuch, gunning for a forward.

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Rschmitz said:
Please enlighten us who you think the scrubs are. Geekie, the 20 year old top 10 pick; or Howard, the 20 year old who is likely to win the Hobey Baker? I don't want my homerism getting in the way.
Click to expand...
Scrubs is absolutely an incorrect assertion. Those guys are great prospects. The problem for Buffalo is we already have a huge and talented prospect pool and it largely consists of forwards. We need NHL players not prospects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zwui21 and DistantThunderRep
toddkaz said:
How is that ironic though? I still don't get it.

Are you implying Buffalo's players are scrubs yet you want them? Thats the true irony.
Click to expand...
Ah, I see, you are just a little slow. The organizations has been scrub heaven for over a decade, and been a joke the whole time. They have made questionable moves and trades for over a decade.

I also never implied any players were bad. I also said it's not feasible for Tampa to get Tuch. But some how your butt is so hurt, you decided to lash out because words on the internet made up upset.

Enjoy the Sabres, as hard as that is year and after year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz
DistantThunderRep said:
Ah, I see, you are just a little slow. The organizations has been scrub heaven for over a decade, and been a joke the whole time. They have made questionable moves and trades for over a decade.

I also never implied any players were bad. I also said it's not feasible for Tampa to get Tuch. But some how your butt is so hurt, you decided to lash out because words on the internet made up upset.

Enjoy the Sabres, as hard as that is year and after year.
Click to expand...
The organization or the players? All I asked was where is the irony and you went full Karen here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Washed Up 29YearOld
toddkaz said:
The organization or the players? All I asked was where is the irony and you went full Karen here.
Click to expand...
It's like you have a tough time reading? My comments are right there. You were the one who implied I think buffalo players were scrubs. I never did. It's pretty simple to read my comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz
DistantThunderRep said:
It's like you have a tough time reading? My comments are right there. You were the one who implied I think buffalo players were scrubs. I never did. It's pretty simple to read my comments.
Click to expand...
I read them but this thread is about Tuch and you want on some rant about the sabres organization which was bizarre
 
Rschmitz said:
Cool, now how are Howard and Geekie scrubs, as the last poster said?
Click to expand...
So now he has to defend what any other poster says if they are a Buffalo fan? If i find something outrageous a tampa fan has said are you responsible for defending it? Argue with the poster who said the thing you don't like. Don't put that shit on other posters needlessly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougBodger
Mattilaus said:
So now he has to defend what any other poster says if they are a Buffalo fan? If i find something outrageous a tampa fan has said are you responsible for defending it? Argue with the poster who said the thing you don't like. Don't put that shit on other posters needlessly.
Click to expand...

No, you don't. He quoted my reply to the other poster. That is why I asked, I wanted to know if he had something to add, or else why quote me?
 
Rschmitz said:
No, you don't. He quoted my reply to the other poster. That is why I asked, I wanted to know if he had something to add, or else why quote me?
Click to expand...
Well, we are in a thread designed for us to speculate on what Tampa might trade to get Tuch. You and the other poster seemed to be debating on the value of two of Tampa's prospects.

I can't speak for the person who responded to you, but if I was to see that post and respond I suppose my natural reaction would be to comment on whether or not I had interest in said prospects. I know this is long winded but I guess what I am saying is they likely responded to your post to indicate that, regardless of any discussion on what defines a scrub, they aren't interested in those two prospects. That's my guess as to why they quoted you anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz
Mattilaus said:
Well, we are in a thread designed for us to speculate on what Tampa might trade to get Tuch. You and the other poster seemed to be debating on the value of two of Tampa's prospects.

I can't speak for the person who responded to you, but if I was to see that post and respond I suppose my natural reaction would be to comment on whether or not I had interest in said prospects. I know this is long winded but I guess what I am saying is they likely responded to your post to indicate that, regardless of any discussion on what defines a scrub, they aren't interested in those two prospects. That's my guess as to why they quoted you anyways.
Click to expand...
I'm about to be equally long winded friend.

Since he quoted me asking the other poster about who the scrubs were, I thought it made sense to ask him if he were speaking to that. That wasn't me asking him randomly to speak for someone else out of the blue, it made contextual sense for me to follow up. I wasn't being rude, I just asked.

As to his response, if anything, it wasn't relevant to what I said. I understand that Buffalo doesn't want futures and that this is an unlikely trade because of that. Fair enough. That's very different than saying we were offering scrubs, which was just an attempt by the other poster to troll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mattilaus
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom