Nikolajs Sillers
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2021
- 4,876
- 3,431
Yes - it's too bad Boston couldn't have looked into the future and seen these contract issues coming up with Swayman. Dammit Sweeney - buy a freaking crystal ball and save yourself all these headaches.
No, if you deserve $8m you better be playing 60 games. We aren’t talking your run of the mill $5m player here.But that is the old NHL, riding a goalie to the ground. Nowadays teams are using both goalies.
Neely isn't a GM.I would believe any GM over any agent. Agents are carbon copies of your typical car salesman.
Refreshingly honest.Look I’m not going to sugar coat this. I am loving every second of this.
I hate the bruins, and I hope facing their own ‘big decision’ with a contract that they’ve had to face in a decade blows up in their face and the team suffers.
Is 8x8 really team friendly tho....This is the definition of f*** around and find out. The teams f*** around by tearing down their players trying just to get a discount on the contracts. Now they're finding out after the player outperformed that contract and isn't about to sign a team friendly deal. Good on Swayman
Still remarkable that they thought it was a good idea to deal Ullmark without being anywhere near close to signing Swayman.
Lol electing for arbitration doesn't mean he can't be upset by the arguments made to lower his value. Your metaphor is junk.I can’t get over a guy becoming offended at a process THAT HE ELECTED FOR.
I’m not gonna go to a comedy club where the comedians roast the crowd I’m easily offended or can’t take a joke.
This...I seem to recall about the potential for things to go bad for the Boston brass had they not moved Ullmark (and possible Swayman contract woes afterwards)...Funny how the well oiled Bruins netminding duo sorta fell apart.Holy crap - how many times does it need repeating here that the Bruins needed to deal Ullmark before July 1st.
Lol electing for arbitration doesn't mean he can't be upset by the arguments made to lower his value. Your metaphor is junk.
I'm pretty damn certain Swayman's agent Lewis Gross planned this out...Just that he was certain Neely/Sweeney would have caved in by now...Yes - it's too bad Boston couldn't have looked into the future and seen these contract issues coming up with Swayman. Dammit Sweeney - buy a freaking crystal ball and save yourself all these headaches.
You don't think they were trying to sign him before trading away Ullmark ????
I'd love to be a fly on the wall for all of this because even though I don't really think much of it is out of line, both sides have made it unnecessarily contentious.
from a logistical standpoint I have to wonder what the front office is thinking...you have a goalie you raked in arbitration, represented by an agent notorious for this AND with recent bad blood, AND you just traded away your alternative leverage (Ullmark)...and you just assume he's going to play nice? That seems like a bad assumption and the major misstep that's leading to all the grumpiness. I don't blame Gross or Swayman for holding them hostage as such, minus the theatrics. Assuming it was all in good faith, of course.
I do think both sides swallow their pride and get something done. It's the best ending for everyone involved and maybe I'm being naive but it just seems like both are playing extreme hardball. The question for me is just--and it's literally a question, I have no idea--is Swayman's mental game strong enough to get to work after this or is he all psyched out because of 'what the team thinks of him' in arbitration and offers and otherwise.
I dont know, if Im the front office, maybe i start the season with Korpisalo and get some wins just to add some pressure.
I could be swayed on either side here, I think...I'm just legitimately intrigued. Negotiations are always what I nerd out on
Kissing daIf Swayman is this thin-skinned to not realize that's all part of negotiations, maybe the B's are right to not cave to his outrageous demands.
Everyday he just comes off like a bigger whiner.
Seems to me swayman wants to be paid like a workhorse, but he hasn't had the opportunity to be one. What is the most starts he's ever had?
A solution might be to sign a short term deal and see how he does with a larger load, but maybe that isn't part of the bruins belief system right now to have a guy pick up the lions share of burden in net.
Nylander got paid. And then he got paid again. In what way were his interests not served?Yeah I don’t mind Gross doing his job either. Although at some point, see Nylander as a RFA, when chasing every penny isn’t actually in the players interest.
There is obviously history with the Bruins and Gross with Krug. Gross wouldn’t meet them where they wanted, so the Bruins pulled their offer and said “fine good luck”.
Swayman has less options than Krug here since he is an RFA. I take both sides at their word when they say they want Swayman to stick around and that Swayman wants to be a Bruins, but you hate to see the public comments escalating. I would have done the same thing as Neely, but it is an escalation that could backfire. Regardless, if the Bruins took a no-Gross policy in the future, I wouldn’t complain.
Nylander got paid. And then he got paid again. In what way were his interests not served?
Options--Can't Swayman sit out this year (he has made around $6M so far so he can afford to) get to his free agent year of 27, Nov 28, 2025 and then get his money from another team?Yeah I don’t mind Gross doing his job either. Although at some point, see Nylander as a RFA, when chasing every penny isn’t actually in the players interest.
There is obviously history with the Bruins and Gross with Krug. Gross wouldn’t meet them where they wanted, so the Bruins pulled their offer and said “fine good luck”.
Swayman has less options than Krug here since he is an RFA. I take both sides at their word when they say they want Swayman to stick around and that Swayman wants to be a Bruins, but you hate to see the public comments escalating. I would have done the same thing as Neely, but it is an escalation that could backfire. Regardless, if the Bruins took a no-Gross policy in the future, I wouldn’t complain.