Would be a big loss for Valencia.
Good low-risk move by Sevilla.
That really depends on his wages.
I would have to see something that actually explains why the current board thinks that Frenkie's renewal and those of others were "criminal". I'm skeptical it was anything more than extremely stupid management, but I wouldn't write it off considering the previous board. The "news" that was posted in this thread last week failed to mention a thing or two that was reported about the previous board's conduct that might have someone smart enough not putting it past something like what you're posting having actually happened. I mean after all, this is a board that paid to have false things written about their captain and best player ever while he was still at the club.
PETE JENSON IN SPAIN: Barcelona were so desperate to satisfy LaLiga's financial rules that they bought their own TV rights future revenue from themselves, and tried to declare it as new income.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Barcelona were so desperate to satisfy
LaLiga's financial fair play rules this summer that they bought their own TV rights future revenue from themselves, and tried to declare the deal as new income.
Spanish radio station Cope revealed the perfectly legal manoeuvre and confirmed that LaLiga did not accept the artificially-inflated declared income, leaving the club still trying to find ways to register all their new signings.
So it was "an accounting trick" that
the league denied and that would have had to have been reconciled at some point down the road thus giving the club a temporary advantage from said "accounting trick". And?
"I dont like the news, so I will attack the story"
Following a turbulent time both on and off the pitch last year, Barcelona were faced with a mountain of debt and drastic action was required. Out of necessity, the club sold part
www.marca.com
BARCELONA: Barcelona on Friday announced they had sold a further 15 percent of their La Liga television rights to US investment group Sixth Street for the next
www.newindianexpress.com
Barcelona have sold a further 15% of their domestic television rights to the global investment firm Sixth Street.
www.espn.com
How many other sources will you need to show how they are trying to cheat?
Well if you're posting something that's coming from Cope any Cule with an ounce of sense is going to question it. If you don't understand that yourself then you should probably do your homework. That said, I don't necessarily doubt the story.
As for what you posted with regards to other stories, they don't do what you're suggesting. Well you're not suggesting, you're accusing, and quite frankly you have done nothing to demonstrate your accusation is valid. In fact, two of the three articles you linked here actually suggest otherwise. The Marca one, which is just rehashing what you already posted, is one thing. I'd take Marca over Cope, but again a loaded source when we're talking about Barça and this is simply relaying the story from Cope. Again though, so what? This is "old news" and the league denied the figure after presumably being presented with all the documentation which of course means the club was up front about everything.
As for the second two sources, again, those suggest that the club is NOT trying to cheat. It's actually the other way around and if you don't understand that which would be a reasonable assumption considering the post I'm quoting here you should probably stick to things you actually do understand. The fact the club is taking the steps they are with regards to the economic levers means they're doing what they can within the rules and law to keep the club financially solvent. Activating these levers means they're sacrificing some future revenue to help tackle their current debt, a move that could backfire down the road and that they don't want to do. Have a look at your own sources and see the money that Sixth Street will likely walk away from the deal.
So in the end your posts have little by way of news, have misused sources that actually disprove what you're accusing the club and demonstrate that you're wrong. Nicely done. For future, and this goes for anyone else here considering the posts, I would suggest actually coming to the table with a reasonable argument. Also though, I would love it for anyone to come to the table with an alternative solution the club could/should have sought.
It’s apparently not cheating. I think there is a question on if this is ethical, but the fans of the offending team rarely care about that. Team wants to get better, so they get players. The Cules won’t care how many levers get pulled. I don’t like when it comes to teams taking away squad numbers, trying to renege on contracts and putting pressure on players to forgive where they messed up but it’s apparently not “illegal”.
--Nothing "apparent" about it. It's not cheating.
--This fan cares as do a whole helluva a lot of others in my experience and they do care about the levers as this forum is evidence.
--They "took away" one squad number, assuming they took it away. Nothing wrong with trying to negotiate a new contract with a player. Not sure what pressure is, but do tell.
This will be weird to some on here but news not from the fail.
One of the good things about this is that guys like Alonso have to wait and maybe we'll miss out on signing him.