Except I never said that intelligence is the main reason why we should eat animals. It's merely to state that we are the superior species. And under the metric of sheer ability and accomplishment we are indeed superior. Im not saying that superiority in intelligence is a fair justification to murder another being. Certainly not within the species. This is where ethics come in.
Your hyperbolic example is understood but inappropriate. Would you extend it to say that if people fail this iq test, people should eat that person? From the beginning Ive argued that eating other animals is justified because in nature there has always been a food chain. And the carnivores with the means and strength to consume those lower on the chain always have and always will.
I never said intelligence was the metric for our place on the food chain. But you obtusely took the concept of intelligence and applied it to an absurd comparison saying it's some jurlstification for in species murder.
Its quite funny that you claim most if us here are incapable of proceeding with a proper debate and yet your debate tactics are laced with self serving logical fallacies.
