Read his posts again, you "grown *** man". He clearly goes far, far, far beyond pointing out "flaws" in Subban's personlity, something that was readily apparent to everyone else on this board.
And I clearly point out that I do not agree with his characterization of PK Subban.
You think he posted some things that have substance, then try actually being a "grown *** man" and having the intellectual honestly to present them in detail, instead of using your typical noncommittal, vague as **** non-statements.
I touched on a few of them, and you as usual, took them and twisted them to be what you want to it to be. We've done this song and dance before.
What solid stuff are you referring to exactly?
This...
Take someone who bullies you by spreading false rumors about you behind your back. They always pick the right words so that they can have plausible deniability afterwars. So, they'll talk to your coworkers and imply/hint that you are not trustworthy, but they'll never actually say it, because they want to be able to deny it. Then you come along and call the bully on their behavior, but you look like you're just a paranoid one because you have no "proof". It's just a misunderstanding, you see. When the bully hinted that you are not trustworthy, he didn't mean it in a bad way, it's just a misunderstanding. What proof do you have that the bully actually has it out for you?
The bully actually takes advantage of the fact that others require "proof"
Emotional manipulators love the concept of "proof" because most of their behavior is specifically designed to look innocent
Also this...
He goes to the Gala, cracks a few jokes, has a big smile on his face, and to his fans it looks all innocent, but look at what he actually accomplished. He reinforced every single anti-management pro-PK impression out there, showing himself to be a master manipulator who is very adept at managing people's impressions and being charming. All of a sudden, management is on the defensive and because it was a comedy show, there is this cover of "oh, it was just comedy" and management would look like they can't take a joke if they get offended by anything he says. In fact, they don't just look like they can't take a joke, they look like they are the ones who are being aggressive because they would look like they are attacking PK for having a personality and cracking jokes. That's what covert aggression does - it hides the aggressive intention in the original act, so that when the victim reacts to the abuse, the victim looks like they are the one being aggressive. Like a bully who spreads lies about you behind your back and makes you look like you're the crazy paranoid aggressive one when you freak out about it.
There are a few other things Vlad touched on that made me think...
Does that satisfy your blood thirst?
Which don't you agree with?
I'll say it AGAIN...I don't agree with Vlad how he's essentially saying that PK Subban's philanthropic endeavours are just a ruse to feed his narcissistic tendencies. I think PK Subban is very genuine as a person so I think everything he does for charities is because he's a great person, not because, or rather, not exclusively because he loves the attention.
I also don't agree with psychologically analyzing someone who I don't know...
again, he went at lengths in his post and I didn't agree with everything, but some of it hit a nerve with me.
Which do you think merit not being immediately dismissed?
What exactly provoked you about that particular passage?
More of the same questions, that I've already answered...skim through the thread
Again, you post nothing of substance, just a desperate attempt to **** on Subban without actually having to back it up with specific arguments or positions.
Yet you can't help yourself to respond to my posts...seems you find some substance to it...
You know what I do when someone posts something with no substance?
I don't reply to it.
What's pathetic? My posts...
or you taking the time to respond to my posts?