The Gloaming
23
I thought Bickel had a two way contract. I don't think you can spin the AHL angle if that is the case...
What does the 2 way contract have anything to do with? All it means is that Pickles gets less money for playing in the A.
I thought Bickel had a two way contract. I don't think you can spin the AHL angle if that is the case...
Pizza party if the team scores three goals tomorrow??
What does the 2 way contract have anything to do with? All it means is that Pickles gets less money for playing in the A.
I'm not suspecting he'll get claimed, it's just odd I think. Had they done it yesterday, he could've cleared today rather than waiting for Monday at noon (someone correct me if I'm wrong there).
If Bickel was on a one-year deal I could see a team claiming him. Versatile in the sense that he can play forward or D and can drop the gloves and handle his own. A few teams I'm sure wouldn't mind having a guy like that around as an emergency kind of player.
With another year left on his contract though? Don't think so.
Wouldn't be surprised to see Zucc back soon as a result of all this. My only issue with him is that he seems to want immunity against getting sent down. I read something about him not wanting to play in the AHL again. Frankly, nobody with as little NHL experience as he has deserves that sort of treatment.
Cause you don't have to put him through waivers if he has a two way contract. My point is if the Rangers were trying to spin that Bickel was being sent down to the AHL for conditioning; it doesn't make sense that he would go through waivers.
The only immunity against being sent to the AHL is an NMC. Ony UFAs can get an NMC/NTC. Zucc wants a 1 way contract so that he will get paid the same whether he's in the NHL or the AHL. I don't think that's unreasonable, considering he'll probably have to take a pay cut to play in the NHL anyway.
Cause you don't have to put him through waivers if he has a two way contract. My point is if the Rangers were trying to spin that Bickel was being sent down to the AHL for conditioning; it doesn't make sense that he would go through waivers.
Cause you don't have to put him through waivers if he has a two way contract. My point is if the Rangers were trying to spin that Bickel was being sent down to the AHL for conditioning; it doesn't make sense that he would go through waivers.
Tweets from Gross:
"Bickel on being waived: 'It's been tough for me to get an opportunity and play any minutes on the back end to develop my confidence.'"
"Stu Bickel says it's 'Wait and see' for the next 24 hours. He won't comment further. Safe to say, though, he's hoping to be claimed."
Develop confidence? I hope its not confidence in anything pertaining to hockey skills...
its more like "Its been tough for me sitting in the press box. My fists thirst for blood."
He didn't want "immunity" in paper so much as he seemed to be implying that he wasn't going to come back to NY unless he was sure that they wanted him on the Rangers and not the Whale.
Check again. 2 way contract has nothing to do with whether or not you have to go through waivers.
Maybe he did. But again, I wouldn't blame him. The guy has been a star in the SEL. He's playing and earning good money in the KHL. If I was him, I wouldn't want to be stuck playing in Hartford either. At this point, I don't see how it would benefit him.
Now THIS is a move I can get behind.
Exactly. You want to start waiving people, start by waiving the worst player, and Bickel is clearly that guy.