I am not questioning his decision, nor trying to make it for him. I am trying to understand his motivations for signing at a steep discount, because I am afraid of the rumored 4 year extension. If money is a concern for him, then the Blues may have to pay it forward on the next contract. That could end up being a pretty bad deal for decent term in exchange for one good year. If being closer to his son is worth millions of dollars to him, then maybe the extension won't be as bad. I could care less about the situation with his son outside of how it effects the future roster construction and cap for my favorite team going forward. Many people had spoken about his son as a reason for wanting to be there. I thought it may be public knowledge I just wasn't aware. Its not like I care where he went on vacation, who he is currently dating, or any other trivial details about celebrities that are always on the internet.
I only wanted to know why he would give up a 3x$3.5 offer to play on McDavid's wing for a 1x$1.7M offer to start on the Blues 4th line. I am sure he is not the only NHL player with less than ideal custody arrangements for their child. Why can't he do what they do? Or why is it more important to him to give up so much than it is for anyone else? I've never once heard of an athlete turning down more money than he has as of yet made in his career.
In terms of selfishness, I would think, barring abuse or something of the sort, being close to both parents would be in the child's best interest. If he gives her a huge bump in child support to make it easier on her to facilitate that, is it really selfish? It is by definition selfish for her to make him give up millions to see his child, although it is completely understandable. Still, that decision would be concerned with her own happiness, and not his and potentially not the child's. Making the offer to compensate her for uprooting her life, makes both parents more financially secure and gives the child access to both parents. That seems like a win-win in the abstract without knowing the details
As for me, I don't have any kids, so I don't need a relationship with my exes. Also, I gave up a decent paying job at a law firm to run a not-for-profit corporation where I make half as much. So money isn't my prime motivator, and I understand taking less money for other concerns. However, if the amount were $2M a year less, I'd be a lawyer who donates money to my not-for-profit's cause. Money isn't everything, but it can solve a lot of problems. But you really seem overly concerned about my personal life, almost uncomfortably so. Asking about my relationship with my exes maybe isn't appropriate for a hockey forum
Seriously, just teasing a bit with that last part.