Okay, so I see you are trying to compare two completely different situations, one with a coach and one with a player. I assumed you were talking about "matching competing offers" and such (you know, exactly what you said), which it is absolutely not clear that was the case. You are assuming Holland wasn't able to match Tampa's offer without anything that indicates such.
If we're talking about Holland's
ability to keep Filppula, then I'd refer you back to the Babcock quote. I'm assuming Holland wasn't
willing to match Tampa's offer. The story in the press all along was that Holland wasn't willing to meet Fil's demands of that $5mil/5yr territory, and judging from what was coming out of the horse's mouth in the days leading up to July 5th, 2013, I'd have to believe that was the case:
July 3rd
“He’s looking forward to July 5,†Holland said. “There’s a significant difference (in negotiations). That’s why it doesn’t appear we’re positioned to do a deal.
“It makes good sense for Fil and his agent to see what’s out there. I’ll stay in contact with Fil’s agent. If it’s time to leave, it’s time to leave.
“When players hit the open market they’re probably moving on. Players usually get offers that are better because so many teams are in play.
Read: Holland knew his offer wasn't as good as what Fil was likely to get on the open market.
Already the day before FA day,
July 4th Holland was signaling he was leaning towards Weiss:
“Do we have Dan Cleary signed, or not signed? Do we have Brunner signed or not signed? Do we have Stephen Weiss signed or not signed? I don’t know,†Holland said.
You can keep towing the line that "it is absolutely not clear that was the case" that Holland wasn't willing to match, that because there's no definitive firsthand account confirming or denying that that was the case, that the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence etc., but then we're quickly going the way of flying spaghetti monsters. If Holland were willing to match, then don't you think that would be the "bomb" over at the Malik Report?
I don't think Mickey would blatantly lie for no reason. Him saying "Holland sent him an offer before free agency and during free agency" is pretty straightforward. As far as Holland being a straight shooter, are you under the impression that Holland is lying?
Straw-man. If you're at the end of the line while playing the telephone message game and end up with the garbled message, do you accuse the person who whispered you the message of lying? (or the person before them, or the person before them?)
I never accused either person of lying-- intentionally deceiving by saying something they knew not to be true. Holland is often discreet and economical with the truth (which can be deceptive at times, but in any case isn't necessarily lying). Mickey paraphrases as a rule, and that information on the Malik Report is Malik's synopsizing of Mickey's paraphrasing of what was apparently Holland's version of events. Given that manner in which it was reported and the context of how Malik presented it within the piece, it's pretty clear that it wasn't meant to be a refutation of Babcock's quote that "the money was all gone."