TopShelfGloveSide
Registered User
- Dec 10, 2018
- 19,931
- 28,883
Lol some people will never be happy.He’s got 2 points and is +2 under Woodcroft.
Lol some people will never be happy.He’s got 2 points and is +2 under Woodcroft.
Smith said basically the same thing, he was just more tactful about it (which is surprising because it’s Mike Smith lol).
This is my take as well. Am I glad we have him? Hell yes. Would I be happier if we had him at 3M cap hit instead of his full cap hit but our 2LD spot is far better than it was a year ago.I dont really get it with Keith either.
On one hand I dont really like the trade. I think there had to be some retention. And I dont like the second year.
But the player is an upgrade for sure over Jones and a third. I am a bit dissapointed with his defensive play without the puck. I think his defensive play might look better in Woodcrofts system as well. Every other dmans defensive game has pretty much improved because the forwards are helping out too.
I knew you were biased, ageism (just like Holland )Is it on the Oilers site. I'll take a look. You're just as inclined as me to look at things certains ways so I'll derive my own opinion. Look, I know Tippett was done. It was time to hang it up. But I'm the same age as the guy, so I kinda feel for him. He's a decent man. Theres worse people still in management in this org.
He’s got 2 points and is +2 under Woodcroft.
I knew you were biased, ageism (just like Holland )
Is it on the Oilers site. I'll take a look. You're just as inclined as me to look at things certains ways so I'll derive my own opinion. Look, I know Tippett was done. It was time to hang it up. But I'm the same age as the guy, so I kinda feel for him. He's a decent man. Theres worse people still in management in this org.
Lol how is LA a poor club?He was a worst on team -15 before that. Should I just ignore that. You think two games against poor clubs was very indicative? The Oilers outscored the opposition handily, no thanks to stone hands Foegele. He did get an assist last night which is almost amazing, but also a GA.
TRust me its going to take more time for the player to win back enthusiasm for him being here. Right now its looking like another WTF Hollland contract.
This was me too...
I stopped watching after the first goal...just thought we were back to "normal". Came back in the 3rd and it was tied at least. I was surprised as we were being outplayed.
Then bam bam bam and it's a 5-2 win
SHOCKED
Lol how is LA a poor club?
He wasn’t very good under Tippett.He was a worst on team -15 before that. Should I just ignore that. You think two games against poor clubs was very indicative? The Oilers outscored the opposition handily, no thanks to stone hands Foegele. He did get an assist last night which is almost amazing, but also a GA.
TRust me its going to take more time for the player to win back enthusiasm for him being here. Right now its looking like another WTF Hollland contract.
He's really starting to shine as a forechecker. That long reach and active stick man...he's still improving too. I think Woody is going to be a big bonus to the kid.Jesse could have a Selke like future. His contributions run way beyond the scoreboard. He's at least an all zone player who doesn't take any shortcuts in any zone. He's there for the rough ride fighting to be in the crease as well and hard to move out of there. Point shot goals, screens, deflections happen because of Jesse.
Lol they are on average club and we worked them. That doesn’t take anything away from foegs having a solid game. How is that confusing?They aren't. Foegele had the +2 game against a bad club. The Sharks have been awful in 2022 and are headed straight to golfing. How is that confusing?
He wasn’t very good under Tippett.
All bets are off now with this roster under a different coach. It’s why Holland needed to do it sooner so he could properly evaluate these players under actual competent coaching. Not saying Foegele is some world beater but my guess is a lot of players will look better under Woodcroft. Barrie and Foegele already do.
Definitely not too complex. Foegele and Smith have already said that Woodcroft has upped the level of detail.
Lol they are on average club and we worked them. That doesn’t take anything away from foegs having a solid game. How is that confusing?
He has given himself less time to properly evaluate the roster before the trade deadline because he waited so long to get a competent coach. That’s my concern.Holland DIDN'T Need to make the change sooner, and in fact it seems right on time. Where we place doesn't matter in the slightest. Just getting in the playoffs is really all that matters and preferably a top 3 spot which still looks doable.
For sure I'll look at how the players improve or regress, and the team. We're riding short sample right now that could just as easily be standard coaching fire bump, which is a common dynamic often lasting a half dozen or more games. We won't know for a month what we got. REally we won't know until playoffs that the team wont revert to bad habits. They've done it countless times before.
You mean when the poster told me to "go to bed" and I'm the inappropriate one? Come on now.
f*** off was probably a little extreme though and I shouldn't have said it, in retrospect, but it was late and I was getting lambasted with angry responses.
A ridiculous comment that was also shared by a few other posters that committing that the penalty in a tied, tight checking, game late in the 2nd was a bad penalty so yeah, I struggled with being told to "go to bed" just because posters disagreed with me and now you're calling my opinion "ridiculous" just because you disagree with it.
It was a valid opinion. I like Kane showing toughness but that was not the time or place for it IMO. Lemeiux baited him into it and it could have cost the Oilers the game in a game where scoring chances were few and far between.
If Kassian had done that, I bet a bunch of posters would have called him a bonehead etc. because he's on the hated list currently but with Kane being the new guy, perspective is different.
Anyway, lets move on. I have my opinion and you have yours. BTW, you see how I didn't call your opinion "ridiculous". There's a way of having a civil exchange even through disagreement.
Sounds rough man, hope you guys are ok staying up late on vacation in the Caribbean...We’re on vacation in the Caribbean. These late games don’t even start until 11:30.
Im going to exaggerate but when asked the difference between old and new coaches Hyman basically said "new coach said we should play defense, too"
Lol sure keeping looking at games whatever way you want to try and support your narrative. Foegs sucks because San Jose didn’t try… lol right.SJ are 22nd in league in win percentage and falling. They are clearly a non playoff club that was mailing in the game. It was the least pushback from a team I'd seen all season. The Sharks flat out don't care. The biggest thing their lol fans had to do was book Kane in between booing their own club. good times..
He has given himself less time to properly evaluate the roster before the trade deadline because he waited so long to get a competent coach. That’s my concern.
There is also a difference between coach bump and actual improvements in structural play.
The former is usually related to energy and motor drive, and Gulutzan managed to do that in his short time as temp coach.
The latter is more obvious through watching how the team sets up on breakouts and the neutral zone.