NHL Standings Watch 2024-2025 - UPDATED 2/02/25

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
So the majority of the contenders?
IMG_4704.jpeg
 
Oh alright I didn’t know we were classifying all those teams as contenders
Well if you’re counting the Rangers at 52 points like everyone seems to then yeah. Certainly the first group though - I dont consider the Penguins in the mix but I didn’t really see the Islanders getting hot either.

General, overall point is that the Bruins are playing right with the others in the Mid Morass results wise.
 
Bad news, good news. Detroit is on a 6 game win streak (bad); Montreal is dead last on your chart and has lost five in a row (happy dance).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenway
and Detroit just passed us

View attachment 971709
I've been on it for some time now that GD. Games in hand for other teams is not good, but that goal differential continues to be the most disturbing number. Has been all season. It's been just about the only consistent characteristic of the 24/25 Bruins.

I just don't think I can recall a team with a -26 GD even smelling the playoffs once the season is said and done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Hockey Tonk Man
Bad news, good news. Detroit is on a 6 game win streak (bad); Montreal is dead last on your chart and has lost five in a row (happy dance).
Detroit will be buying at the deadline as they want to be in the playoffs

IF the Bruins miss they need to be in the bottom 11 to get a chance in the lottery

Neely and Sweeny have the crop report but is it the right one?





1738590662717.png
 
I've been on it for some time now that GD. Games in hand for other teams is not good, but that goal differential continues to be the most disturbing number. Has been all season. It's been just about the only consistent characteristic of the 24/25 Bruins.

I just don't think I can recall a team with a -26 GD even smelling the playoffs once the season is said and done.
Last year’s Capitals were a -37 and made playoffs.
 
Detroit will be buying at the deadline as they want to be in the playoffs

IF the Bruins miss they need to be in the bottom 11 to get a chance in the lottery

Neely and Sweeny have the crop report but is it the right one?





View attachment 971793

I wonder how many of these bubble teams are going to buy in an attempt to get over the hump and get their young talent some experience in the playoffs.
Just a completely different situation compared to the Bruins who expected to be a Cup contender this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KillerMillerTime
Last year’s Capitals were a -37 and made playoffs.
They got better goaltending than this crop of Bruins.

I think I've hurt my brain. I don't need coffee anymore, as I just pop over to any stats site and see the Bruins dive bombing their goal differential and I'm ready to yell at snowplows.
 
Last edited:
2 totally situations, the Habs got so putrid they simply had to go full rebuild, B`s didn`t so we have or are watching a retool, not going great and not saying it was/is the right approach but..
Bruins are putrid as helllllllll
 
I didn't realize that. Thanks.

Had to be a massive outlier historically, though.
In the salary cap era it absolutely is. Pre salary cap/southern expansion, it was a relatively regular occurrence given essentially 75% of the league made the playoffs.

Screenshot 2025-02-03 115736.png

That's not even an exhaustive list either, that's just the worst of the worst.

Some other notable examples:

1990-91 Canucks: -72
1990-91 Whalers: -38
1991-92 North Stars: -32 (somehow made it to the cup final)
1994-95 Sharks: -32

IIRC Washington's -37 is the worst to qualify since the 2012 Panthers, who not only got in, but won the burning trash heap known as the Southeast division with a laughably bad -27 differential
 
  • Like
Reactions: Number8
In the salary cap era it absolutely is. Pre salary cap/southern expansion, it was a relatively regular occurrence given essentially 75% of the league made the playoffs.

View attachment 971848
That's not even an exhaustive list either, that's just the worst of the worst.

Some other notable examples:

1990-91 Canucks: -72
1990-91 Whalers: -38
1991-92 North Stars: -32 (somehow made it to the cup final)
1994-95 Sharks: -32

IIRC Washington's -37 is the worst to qualify since the 2012 Panthers, who not only got in, but won the burning trash heap known as the Southeast division with a laughably bad -27 differential
:laugh: Thanks for the reminder. I'd forgotten that in the old days 16 out of 21 teams made it in. As you show, that allowed for some pretty putrid teams to crawl over the line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blitzkrug
There is a chance that they can get hot. Will need W's in the remaining games before the 4 Nations at the very least. We'll see.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't go that far, but I'm thinking their one more @$$ whipping away, like the Sabres and Jets gave them, from sending out notices to all Playoff minded teams “Give us your best Brad Marchand offer".
Add to the notices, Frederic, Geekie, Brazeau, Koepke, Wotherspoon...all UFA and RFA

.400 pts. percentage since New Year's Eve. That is who they really are.
Yes and they need to be at least 17-8-3 for the rest of this season to get 95pts...will not happen!
 
A team can go from 3rd in the Atlantic to 3rd wild card spot and out in a game or two. It will go down to the last few games. Those 3 point interdivsional overtime games are going to play a role.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad