HockeyVirus
Woll stan.
- Nov 15, 2020
- 19,917
- 30,543
I agree, his playing driving wouldn't necessarily look that much better on a good team...but the results would be much better on a good team. I am still hopeful if Bruno gets canned, we can put Stamkos in a position to be successful, but that hope is fading. He's getting older. This is the year we should be putting him in position to be successful, as with all the players, but unfortunately Bruno is unwavering on how he thinks the game should be played. The roster just isn't a good fit for the frantic up and down play he envisions.It’s pretty well established that Stamkos hasn’t been a play driver since the leg injury. He’s a shooter and still one of the best in the league. That’s mean on a good team he’ll put up good numbers and on a bad team put up bad numbers. The whole Preds team has been awful this year, of course his numbers will look bad.
It’s pretty well established that Stamkos hasn’t been a play driver since the leg injury. He’s a shooter and still one of the best in the league. That’s mean on a good team he’ll put up good numbers and on a bad team put up bad numbers. The whole Preds team has been awful this year, of course his numbers will look bad.
Trotz went full Yzerman, and thankfully beat him out in signing Stamkos.
It’s not just Kuch though. Most of Stamkos points last year were at even strength and most of his ice time at even strength was without Kuch. He needs someone to set him up for shots in the offensive zone but if the team is stuck in the defensive zone he’s certainly not going to score any goals and he’s not the guy to get you out of the defensive zone. It doesn’t have to be a Kucherov but at least someone proficient at moving the puck up the ice or a team system that’s making smart passes up the ice.Talk of players being a product of other players is over blown sometimes….this is not one of those times. That man misses Kuch.
Guentzel is on pace for 49 goals and 88 points.
Safe to say Tampa management knew what was up.
I think most people knew to be honest.
I think most people knew to be honest.
Yeah as soon as I read this I knew I had to look up the numbers.It’s not just Kuch though. Most of Stamkos points last year were at even strength and most of his ice time at even strength was without Kuch. He needs someone to set him up for shots in the offensive zone but if the team is stuck in the defensive zone he’s certainly not going to score any goals and he’s not the guy to get you out of the defensive zone. It doesn’t have to be a Kucherov but at least someone proficient at moving the puck up the ice or a team system that’s making smart passes up the ice.
Guentzel is on pace for 49 goals and 88 points.
Safe to say Tampa management knew what was up.
Guentzel is on pace for 49 goals and 88 points.
Safe to say Tampa management knew what was up.
Takes some stones to just give up on your franchise player and captain and let him walk away in free agency.I think most people knew to be honest.
It's been a little bit since I looked up the numbers but I believe it was about 40-45% of Stamkos' even strength time playing with Kucherov, so him being in on 11/21 ES goals isn't too surprising. And they were always on the PP together and that's where close to half of Stamkos total goals came from when looking at total goals.Yeah as soon as I read this I knew I had to look up the numbers.
You're right that Kucherov didn't play with Stamkos much at even strength which makes your point even worse. Here are the numbers:
Kucherov was in on 28/40 of Stamkos goals 70% !!!!!
Then despite not playing with him much at even strength Kucherov was still in on 11/21 of his even strength goals. More than half!
Stamkos owes Kucherov for getting the new contract he did.