HockeyPops
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2018
- 7,831
- 6,917
No, but I would say it's not looking great for Cali or Croskery. If one of those was close I wouldn't expect them to lead out with this one.
No, but I would say it's not looking great for Cali or Croskery. If one of those was close I wouldn't expect them to lead out with this one
i cant for the life of my see why they would draft croskery if there was even a hint of cali not coming. everyone knew croskery was not coming, you cant take 2 guys with questions back to back and expect it to work out. cali was not even like a high end 1st like a malholtra may be. he was picked about where he thought he should go.No, but I would say it's not looking great for Cali or Croskery. If one of those was close I wouldn't expect them to lead out with this one.
I bet Mignosa would get you quite a bit. Doesn't fit your next window. Someone who has a two year window would probably love to have him. Steelheads would be a good fit.Not contending. Probably trading an OA forward (Allard?) and Gibson and Schenkel.
GIllen has been signed.So, forwards for next year assuming only 2 of our OA Fs are rostered (reasonable assumption):
1. OA1 (04)
2. OA2 (04)
3. Cloutier (05)
4. Mignosa (05)
5. Brown (06)
6. Vader (06)
7. Martin (07)
8. Hayes (07)
9. Smith (07)
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
14 is probably a reasonable number of forwards to carry. That means that we need to find 5 more. I am a little concerned about the prospect pool at this point. I went back to check my notes from the prospect camp. Forwards who I thought showed they might push for a spot in training camp:
A) Cali (08)
B) Andrew (08)
C) Elliott (08)
D) Long (08)
E) Kelly (08)
At first glance, even though we would be young, it looks like we might have enough quality coming up. However, notice their birth year. They are all 08s. We can only roster 4 of the 08s. 2 of them must be Cali and Croskery. That means if Cali and Croskery don't report, we can only roster 2 of our 08s.
Somehow we are going to have to find 5 more forwards. We still have the import draft. Maybe the coaches saw something in some of the 07s at prospect camp that I didn't see. Perhaps trades are made. Maybe we find a few free agents that impress. Obviously, one way or another, our roster will be filled. I expect training camp to be very competitive for the 08s. But the rest of those forward spots might be tough to fill.
This will also impact our defense. Here is our returning defense:
1. Carlisle (04)
2. Gibson (05)
3. Evans (06)
4. BMB (06)
5. Solomon (07)
6.
7.
8.
We have some intriguing defense prospects from our 08 draft this summer (Pangretitsch, Ashcroft, Allen) who probably don't even have a chance to make this team in the fall because of our need to roster two 08 forwards as described above. At least we have decent 07 prospects on D. Based on my recollection from prospect camp, our options include:
A) Gillen (07)
B) Zuyev (07)
We also have the import draft.
Hopefully the team can find enough quality players to fill the holes around Martin. It would be a shame if the GM hasn't set this team up to succeed in the next couple of years.
I watched mignosa in the playoffs. Very underrated. With more responsibility I wouldn’t be shocked to see him break out this yearI bet Mignosa would get you quite a bit. Doesn't fit your next window. Someone who has a two year window would probably love to have him. Steelheads would be a good fit.
Gibson and allard if back should go for a lot.Not contending. Probably trading an OA forward (Allard?) and Gibson and Schenkel.
Agreed, if we weren't so deep on D last year both Gillen and Solomon could have played. Looking forward to their development. So that leaves 1 card for a D to sign still assuming Carlisle is back which I believe is key for leadership of the young D, him and Gibby should log a lot of minutes and mentor the young bucks.Great news! A lot of us thought he could have played last year.
Yes I noticed he had more of an edge to his game at rookie camp this year. Although it was mostly 08s, so we shall see if that translates to playing vs the older players in the league.I really liked Gillen in training camp last year, and thought he could have played. But I think it was probably better for his development that he didn't. He came into rookie camp this year with a chip on his shoulder, and really has added a physical element and even a bit of nastiness to his game that I don't remember seeing a year ago, to go along with his offensive game. It's great to see.
i mean a 1st round package is pretty much the best you can get. i cant imagine what he'd think he needs in addition to that.Yes I noticed he had more of an edge to his game at rookie camp this year. Although it was mostly 08s, so we shall see if that translates to playing vs the older players in the league.
What is happening with Cali? Maybe just negotiating the best deal possible?
I think Cali will sign. I think he struggled with making his decision but Soo meets his needs and ultimately signs.i cant for the life of my see why they would draft croskery if there was even a hint of cali not coming. everyone knew croskery was not coming, you cant take 2 guys with questions back to back and expect it to work out. cali was not even like a high end 1st like a malholtra may be. he was picked about where he thought he should go.
there has been nothing out there on him? i havent heard a thing about cali, but croskey is a school guy 100 percent, at least he has been all year.
i mean a 1st round package is pretty much the best you can get. i cant imagine what he'd think he needs in addition to that.
My bad I thought he signed around the same time as Solomon but I was wrong .Gillens is already signed I believe.