Let's hope today is as exciting as yesterday. Come on Chevy make a splah.
I still think Helle to FLA makes the most sense.Let's hope today is as exciting as yesterday. Come on Chevy make a splah.
BUF Helenius, #20, UPL
FLA Lundell, #40
NJD Mercer, #12, Yegorev
Can't see another fit.
He also has chemistry with Ostlund and Helenius, if we can grab one, that can jump start a 3rd line.I thought Rosen was fine, sure he didn't produce but look he spent most of his time playing with and he was still adapting to a different team. The kid just turned 23, let us give him some time, I would still take him over keeping Stan for example any day of the week and we got a pick on top of it.
My takes…BUF Helenius, #20, UPL
FLA Lundell, #40
NJD Mercer, #12, Yegorev
Can't see another fit.
People probably have coaches and players they dont want to play with.I find it kind of ironic that even Winnipeg Jets players have certain teams they don't want to go to...![]()
Coaches, players, GMs, locations, etc..People probably have coaches and players they dont want to play with.
Florida is still trying to make a deal with Bob. They're running out of time. Helle has to be theyre second option, but obv thats not free like Bob is.I still think Helle to FLA makes the most sense.
He’s signed long enough for them to get a good run with their currant core at an affordable hit…he’s a damn good goalie with playing history with some of their players and their head coach…and he has the drive and ambition to get a cup for his legacy as it’s really the only thing he’s missing
Chances are this is why it won’t happen…lol
From winnipeg, every location is probably better lolCoaches, players, GMs, locations, etc..
Bob is also older, so they risk being in the position of looking for a new goalie again in a year or 2…I think they’re stupid keeping BobFlorida is still trying to make a deal with Bob. They're running out of time. Helle has to be theyre second option, but obv thats not free like Bob is.
We might be keeping him another year…let him play his value upSounds like Chevy isn't getting any good offers for Helle, according to Dreger. 33 coming off a down year sure isn't opening up the market as much as people hoped.
I lurked the Sabres boards. They unanimously want to draft with 4 OA and unanimously don't want Hellebuyck in exchange for it.
Interesting approach. Losing Byram and potentially Tuch after the first playoff run in 15 years hurts, so the natural fix is... let's check... to hate the idea of strengthening the roster with pieces that aren't contributing next year? Do I have this right?
I thought the blueprint of a WPG-BUF trade for Hellebuyck was clear as day 24 hours ago, and now things have changed and it's even clearer. We take on UPL and Norris, which gives them the cap flexibility to keep Tuch. For that, we charge either #4+, Helenius+, or Östlund++. If they bite on McLeod+UPL instead of Norris+UPL, that works too (just don't think the cap does for the Sabres). One plus means a minor piece.
We can afford to take the gamble on whether Norris is healthy enough, because we'll be left for a top C prospect for our troubles anyway. UPL is a good enough replacement for now - we aren't going to be better next year, but if we're dealing Hellebuyck, that's just how it is.
They'll be left with two of Östlund/Helenius/"Björck/Malhotra/Stenberg" to sort out their forward depth chart. Part of the value prop for the Sabres is getting to keep Tuch without jeopardising their long-term extension to Benson. They improve their goaltending massively.
It makes so much sense.
That's more or less been the story of my following of the Jets for the last half a decade.Became it makes sense, is probably why it won't happen.
See…I went the other way…I think with what they now have in assets, they should chase Thomas again…upgrade their CInteresting approach. Losing Byram and potentially Tuch after the first playoff run in 15 years hurts, so the natural fix is... let's check... to hate the idea of strengthening the roster with pieces that aren't contributing next year? Do I have this right?
I thought the blueprint of a WPG-BUF trade for Hellebuyck was clear as day 24 hours ago, and now things have changed and it's even clearer. We take on UPL and Norris, which gives them the cap flexibility to keep Tuch. For that, we charge either #4+, Helenius+, or Östlund++. If they bite on McLeod+UPL instead of Norris+UPL, that works too (just don't think the cap does for the Sabres). One plus means a minor piece.
We can afford to take the gamble on whether Norris is healthy enough, because we'll be left for a top C prospect for our troubles anyway. UPL is a good enough replacement for now - we aren't going to be better next year, but if we're dealing Hellebuyck, that's just how it is.
They'll be left with two of Östlund/Helenius/"Björck/Malhotra/Stenberg" to sort out their forward depth chart. Part of the value prop for the Sabres is getting to keep Tuch without jeopardising their long-term extension to Benson. They improve their goaltending massively.
It makes so much sense. What doesn't make sense is for Buffalo to look at their current situation and decide that keeping all their futures is worth it. Thompson, Samuelsson, and Dahlin are all in their prime - now it's not the time to wait for the next wave to roll around.
Interesting approach. Losing Byram and potentially Tuch after the first playoff run in 15 years hurts, so the natural fix is... let's check... to hate the idea of strengthening the roster with pieces that aren't contributing next year? Do I have this right?
I thought the blueprint of a WPG-BUF trade for Hellebuyck was clear as day 24 hours ago, and now things have changed and it's even clearer. We take on UPL and Norris, which gives them the cap flexibility to keep Tuch. For that, we charge either #4+, Helenius+, or Östlund++. If they bite on McLeod+UPL instead of Norris+UPL, that works too (just don't think the cap does for the Sabres). One plus means a minor piece.
We can afford to take the gamble on whether Norris is healthy enough, because we'll be left for a top C prospect for our troubles anyway. UPL is a good enough replacement for now - we aren't going to be better next year, but if we're dealing Hellebuyck, that's just how it is.
They'll be left with two of Östlund/Helenius/"Björck/Malhotra/Stenberg" to sort out their forward depth chart. Part of the value prop for the Sabres is getting to keep Tuch without jeopardising their long-term extension to Benson. They improve their goaltending massively.
It makes so much sense. What doesn't make sense is for Buffalo to look at their current situation and decide that keeping all their futures is worth it. Thompson, Samuelsson, and Dahlin are all in their prime - now it's not the time to wait for the next wave to roll around.
See…I went the other way…I think with what they now have in assets, they should chase Thomas again…upgrade their C
I don’t know if he would or not…apparently when they tried for him last season, it never got to the asking for him to waive point.From the reports that are out there now, Tuch is gone. "Cap flexibility" to re-sign him doesn't matter much if he's decided he's not sticking around.
So the question they need to ask themselves is, are they better off with Hellebuyck but minus Helenius/Östlund/Byram? Better off enough that they can compete right now? That's assuming that Hellebuyck sees that Tuch is likely gone and Byram is out and decides to waive to go there anyway.
I know the answer on this board would probably be don't trade 4th overall and a young roster player for a 33 year old goaltender.
I think they'd probably be better suited to use it for more skaters than a goaltender, myself.
I agree they should use it to focus on an upgrade at forward but I doubt Thomas waives his no trade for Buffalo at this point.
I hope we get another day of big trades lol
As long as it’s not Reilly to WPG
I hope we get another day of big trades lol