Softest team in the NHL

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
The metrics are Clark's success in past drafts--not just with the Rangers but with other teams. Regarding metrics we could go down through the whole management and coaching staff as well--I mean why just cherry pick? I'm not about to go about ranking other managerial, coaching and scouting staffs of other teams just to come up with a mean average for you. Not only would it be pert near impossible but it would be subjective--not only the rankings but the metrics as well. Besides I'm not sure if I like you that much. So what's important and what's not? Maybe you could tell me--and then I could tell you whether I think you're full of **** or not which seems to be pretty much what your doing with my posts. But in any case nothing I've read or heard leads me to believe that Mr. Dylan McIlrath is not making progress towards becoming the player key Rangers scouts and management people say he is going to become. You might not like these people (and I'm not crazy about all of them either starting with the GMGS) but that's not my problem. If you have 0 faith in any of them that's not my problem either. Maybe you should give hockey management a try.
All i asked for was a rational defense of your opinions. Since you could not offer even the thinnest evidence to back your assertions, it is not shocking that personal insults were the only tricks left in the bag.I am crushed that you don't like me.

The point was that saying a player is good because the guy who drafted him said so is comical, as proof. Reminds me of the two relatives in the Zimmerman trial telling us that they recognize the screams on bad audio that experts can't figure out.
 
Yep and so move on and stop using this line every time people point out that you and others don't see the value of tough hockey players If Lucic was a Rangers his ugly mug would be on billboards city wide as a hero

You look at Lucic as a goon or bodyguard?

No one here doesn't want tough players. Most of us want tough players with skill. Easier said than done.

Best post of thread was the one enthralled with tough guys who don't even suit up.

Lucic is on Boston. No team has an equivalent player but some here seem crazed that the Rangers should have his equivalent. Who or where that guy is remains a mystery.
 
Brian Boyle 28 6-7 244 - can't fight but plays a hard game
Derick Brassard 25 6-1 202 - has balls but wont scare anyone Micheal Haley 27 5-10 204 - feisty guy will have to fight outside of his weight class
Dominic Moore 32 6-0 195 - fiesty but wont scare anyone Brad Richards 33 6-0 196 -should not be on this team Derek Stepan 23 6-0 196 - great player..
Carl Hagelin 24 6-0 186 - fast player..
Chris Kreider 22 6-3 226 - great open ice hitter but also gets crushed a lot Rick Nash 29 6-4 213 - soft for a player his size.
Benoit Pouliot 26 6-3 199 - should be tougher but isn't Taylor Pyatt 31 6-4 230 99 - same as above
Arron Asham 35 5-11 205 - big balls for Hartford
Ryan Callahan 28 5-11 190 - heart of a lion...can't continue to play his game if he want to survive
Derek Dorsett 26 6-0 192 - will get killed fighting the Thortnons of the league
Darroll Powe 28 5-11 201 - sucks Mats Zuccarello 25 5-7 179 - might be toughest guy on the team
Michael Del Zotto 23 6-0 195 - no defense, no offense
Dan Girardi 29 6-2 203 - good player doesn't scare forwards
Aaron Johnson 30 6-2 211 - waste of a contract
Ryan McDonagh 24 6-1 213 - best player outside of Hank, again wont scare anyone
John Moore 22 6-3 214 -very good player...wont scare anyone
Marc Staal 26 6-4 207 - very good player - wont scare anyone Anton Stralman 26 5-11 190 - good player - wont scare anyone
Amazing. Hockey to you is solely about fighting and intimidation. Who on the Rangers looked scared?
 
I think the following players will disagree with you:

B.J. Crombeen
Colton Orr
Jared Boll
Frazer McLaren
George Parros
Shawn Thornton
Ryan Reaves
John Scott
Kevin Westgarth
Tom Sesito
Paul Bissonnette
Krys Barch
Patrick Bordeleau - my favorite guy in this role
Tanner Glass
Brandon Bollig
Matt Kassian
Mike Rupp
Eric Boulton
Matt Carkner

Add up all their playoff minutes for a good laugh.
 
You look at Lucic as a goon or bodyguard?

No one here doesn't want tough players. Most of us want tough players with skill. Easier said than done.

Best post of thread was the one enthralled with tough guys who don't even suit up.

Lucic is on Boston. No team has an equivalent player but some here seem crazed that the Rangers should have his equivalent. Who or where that guy is remains a mystery.

Everyone wants an equivalent. Not going to happen.

What I would have liked to have seen was, somehow, to address the bottom-6 with some guys who could potentially drop the gloves a bit more than say Pyatt or Powe. I like Pouliot and Moore. They are upgrades. I just wish they could find a couple more players who could play the game 10-12 minutes a night AND drop the gloves when called upon to do so. Gregory Campbell, Eric Nystrom, Matt Hendricks, Dwight King, Kyle Clifford, Marcus Foligno, Chad Larose, Juston Abdelkader, Zack Kassian, Brandon Prust, Derek Dorsett, Nick Foligno, Brandon Dubinsky, Wayne Simmonds, Scott Harntnell, Brayden Schenn.

I am not talking about goons. I am talking about guys willing to change the momentum with a fight or sticking up for a teammate. They aren't THAT rare
 
maybe the Rangers should've paid Clowe nearly 5mil over 5 yrs or paid clarkson 5m+ over 7 yrs.
 
Lucic hasn't produced without an elite playmaker like Krejci/Savard on his line. He is an overpaid complimentary player at best and I love the guy due to his Serbian heritage. But I'd take Krejci, Bergeron, Marchand, Eriksson over him any day of the week.
 
maybe the Rangers should've paid Clowe nearly 5mil over 5 yrs or paid clarkson 5m+ over 7 yrs.

No. I said I wanted Clowe for under 3.5 million for 3-4 years. I would not have given him that contract.

The fact of the matter still stands, there are other players who could be had.
 
yeah, I surely yearn for the days where Sather has a fetish for goons like Rupp, Asham, Boogaard, Orr, Shelly, Hollweg, Haley, Brashear, etc. Look how far that got us.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"You win with guys like Shaw, Bollig and Bickell on your roster".

Let's disregard the fact that those players are 3rd liners or worst at best and are not even remotely close to being as valuable as Kane, Toews, Hossa and Sharp. No you win with your top, high end skilled players and depth players in the bottom 6.
 
yeah, I surely yearn for the days where Sather has a fetish for goons like Rupp, Asham, Boogaard, Orr, Shelly, Hollweg, Haley, Brashear, etc. Look how far that got us.

Brashear, Shelly, Boogaard, Rupp, and Hollweg were all bad.

Arron Asham can play hockey and scores some clutch goals.

Colton Orr does his job well, not a great player but better than the guys in the first group.

Haley, idk what to say about him, I do think he can play though.
 
yeah, I surely yearn for the days where Sather has a fetish for goons like Rupp, Asham, Boogaard, Orr, Shelly, Hollweg, Haley, Brashear, etc. Look how far that got us.

Got you further then last season then without them.
Asham scored big goals in playoffs
Rupp very solid vet took regular shift not a goon
Shelly was best ranger on the ice fOr short time when with us
Haley never played Orr was on a shut down fourth line with hollweg and betts did a great job under renney torts never played him ..

Next bad point ?
 
Brashear, Shelly, Boogaard, Rupp, and Hollweg were all bad.

Arron Asham can play hockey and scores some clutch goals.

Colton Orr does his job well, not a great player but better than the guys in the first group.

Haley, idk what to say about him, I do think he can play though.

Asham had 2 goals in the regular season this past season. He is an offensive blackhole to this roster. There is a reason why he was a frequent healthy scratch, even in the playoffs. His toughness and grit got the team nowhere.
 
Asham had 2 goals in the regular season this past season. He is an offensive blackhole to this roster. There is a reason why he was a frequent healthy scratch, even in the playoffs. His toughness and grit got the team nowhere.

And Richards, Hagelin, MZA, Nash got the team where exactly?
 
Got you further then last season then without them.
Asham scored big goals in playoffs
Rupp very solid vet took regular shift not a goon
Shelly was best ranger on the ice fOr short time when with us
Haley never played Orr was on a shut down fourth line with hollweg and betts did a great job under renney torts never played him ..

Next bad point ?

Asham was a big time liability on the ice and was also scratched further on for good reasons.

Rupp couldn't take regular shifts and cost the team in the playoffs with boneheaded penalties and lack of ability to skate. Zucc would've made a world wind of a difference if he was on the roster instead.

I agree Shelly played well for his stint, but the Flyers haven't even played him for good reasons too the past 2 seasons.

Orr is an utter liability at ES statistical wise.

All of those players are terrible at the game of hockey at this point in their careers. I miss none of them.
 
And Richards, Hagelin, MZA, Nash got the team where exactly?

Those 'skilled' players aren't even that skilled in the first place when you rack it up against the Hawks, Pens, Bruins, Kings, Blues, etc. That list consists of tweeners, one borderline star player and one washed up player that can't skate anymore.

What about Ryan Callahan? How far has he gotten this team? For such a gritty, tough player, Callahan is one of the team's worst playoff performers.
 
And Richards, Hagelin, MZA, Nash got the team where exactly?

Whats the point here? I think everyone agrees you need a blend of skill and toughness.

And personally, I think its quite plain to see that the Rangers are not championship caliber in either category.
 
"You win with guys like Shaw, Bollig and Bickell on your roster".

Let's disregard the fact that those players are 3rd liners or worst at best and are not even remotely close to being as valuable as Kane, Toews, Hossa and Sharp. No you win with your top, high end skilled players and depth players in the bottom 6.

Lucic, Horton, Marchand, Getzlaf, Perry, Bertuzzi, Kunitz

I mean let's not act like Chicago was the only team to ever win The Cup.
 
Lucic, Horton, Marchand, Getzlaf, Perry, Bertuzzi, Kunitz

I mean let's not act like Chicago was the only team to ever win The Cup.

Getzlaf and Perry are far from the tough guys this thread is asking for. They are elite, skilled players that engage aggressively in the offensive zone. In terms of skill level, where the heck can the Rangers find players of that ilk? Toughness aside, they are extremely talented hockey players, more so than any player on the Rangers roster. That's exactly the point I'm trying to send across, the Rangers struggled because of lack of talent and skill level, not because of grittiness and toughness.

Betuzzi never won the cup. Marchand/Horton are on par of the toughness that Callahan has, but are much more talented players skill wise, hockey sense wise and naturally gifted mitts and scoring touch. Lucic is the guy here you can mention, but he struggled immensely in that cup winning postseason and as usual, was carried by the superior David Krejci.
 
Are you even a Ranger fan Kershaw? Seems like you hate everyone on the team.

Of course I'm a fan of this team! And people seemingly ignore my posts on McDonagh, Girardi, Stepan, Boyle, Lundqvist, Stralman, MDZ, etc. I have a preference of players that I like and am not quite a fan of, as most posters here are.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad