BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 15,284
- 4,527
Because he was injured and unproductive and not playing with Connor McDavid while on the leafs?
I don’t know, But thank you to Dubas for being stubborn and letting him walk.Zach Hyman has 14 goals and is by far the leading goal scorer in the Stanley Cup. He makes $5.5M per year, a complete bargain that the Leafs didn't want to pay. Unfathomable that the Leafs couldn't pay him that pittance of a salary.
How did the Leafs mismanage the Hyman situation so badly?? I know the guy that made the blunder to let him walk was let go, but my God what a team the Leafs could of had if they kept Hyman and other talented guys they just let go or traded. To make matters worse Hyman is a total beast defensively and is playing more like a $10M+ player. Just shocking mismanagement.
Discuss.
Yeah. Dubas paid the wrong guys. Marner and Matthew aren’t playoff performers either.Hindsight is 20/20. I am not a big Dubas fan but he was hardly a playoff performer with the Leafs and the risk with him was not so much the cap hit, but the term. The prevailing thinking at the time was that Hyman's play style and recent injuries would make him a highly overpaid player.
When you overpay your stars -- you lose the flexibility to take such risks. It's unfortunate.
Hyman loved being a Leaf, and he and his family were from Toronto. He tried to make it work.
My favorite part about the Hyman signing is Dubas acting all high and mighty about trading his rights.
Edmonton was giving you FREE draft picks, and Dubas was like I'm not gonna help out another team that isnt even in my conference.
If they were in the division, or conference maybe i could understand that thinking.
(Like Calgary trading rights to Edmonton)
Otherwise it straight idiotic to suddenly develop a backbone and maintain a hard bargain, while otherwise caving to every contract demand that you signed.
There is not a single person on this forum who thought that Zach Hyman would achieve the heights that he has. Massive, massive respect to the man who has improved every year throughout his career in a way that no other player I have ever seen. Playing with McDavid helps his numbers, but anyone with eyeballs can also tell you that he's not the same player he was when he wore the Leaf, much like how he improved dramatically even while he was a Leaf.
We pay too much money to our core stars and that has caused us to hemorrhage quality depth over the years. Hyman was a useful, but not indispensable piece who struggled to produce in the playoffs, had an injury history with two bad ones in his final years as a Leaf, and ultimately signed a contract that will pay him until he's 36 years old. He had 33 points (43 games) his last year with us and 1p in 7 games his final playoff run. Plenty of us wanted to keep him, but I think that most of us saw that contract and said, "woof, glad it wasn't us."
Well, we were right to be glad about Campbell, wrong to be glad about Hyman. As above, tip your hats to the player who has shattered all expectations and raised his game to a new stratosphere. Zach Hyman is a 50 goal scorer!
They're going to look back at that Tavares signing as where it all went wrong, I think. Could've done so much more without him.Zach Hyman has 14 goals and is by far the leading goal scorer in the Stanley Cup. He makes $5.5M per year, a complete bargain that the Leafs didn't want to pay. Unfathomable that the Leafs couldn't pay him that pittance of a salary.
How did the Leafs mismanage the Hyman situation so badly?? I know the guy that made the blunder to let him walk was let go, but my God what a team the Leafs could of had if they kept Hyman and other talented guys they just let go or traded. To make matters worse Hyman is a total beast defensively and is playing more like a $10M+ player. Just shocking mismanagement.
Discuss.
Objectively, this isn't one of them.Kyle Dubas has made some questionable calls over the years.
After Matthews stole his lunch money, gave him a noogie and shoved him in a locker during RFA negotiations (with ZERO arbitration rights), I don't think Dubas had to worry much about anyone thinking he looked weak.That wasn't what happened. There was an established price to do that and the Oilers wanted to send a lower pick. Dubas was basically like it is worth more to not cave in a negotiation when I know the fair price and lose out on a late round pick than cave and look weak.
The obviously correct answer regardless of what you think of his abilities as the GM.
That wasn't what happened. There was an established price to do that and the Oilers wanted to send a lower pick. Dubas was basically like it is worth more to not cave in a negotiation when I know the fair price and lose out on a late round pick than cave and look weak.
The obviously correct answer regardless of what you think of his abilities as the GM.
Hyman and Kadri. Two heart and soul guys who played for the Leaf on their crest and not just to cash a cheque and hope to be 100% healthy for golf season.Hindsight is 20/20. I am not a big Dubas fan but he was hardly a playoff performer with the Leafs and the risk with him was not so much the cap hit, but the term. The prevailing thinking at the time was that Hyman's play style and recent injuries would make him a highly overpaid player.
When you overpay your stars -- you lose the flexibility to take such risks. It's unfortunate.
Hyman loved being a Leaf, and he and his family were from Toronto. He tried to make it work.
There is a very simple explanation as to the stark difference in Hyman’s production for the two teams. Look at the centers with whom he played with for these two teams:
Next question