Slaf got a talking to

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
I think that Hughes thought that Slaf had the character to handle it. I too did not think the contract would go to his head and for all I know it maybe didn't, but I am sure that there are players he would not hand something like that to.

I think he got his head filled with too much wuwu confidence bullshit. It's all he was talking about when the season started. Too much confidence and too little awareness and effort gets you run over in traffic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77 and Rapala
Seriously? He is on pace for 50 points in 79 games which is better than last year (50 in 82).
Give him some stable linemates and he will produce..
This is why I do not understand.He had chemistry and produced with Caufield and Suzuki. Why MSL wants to breakup the line?
 
A GM can really stick his neck out for a kid, or kids that he decides are his core group.
To a point. Bridge deals can burn a GM just as well as some pointed out but when you have good indications of a rapidly rising cap, an early long term deal to a player dubbed a core asset, will help offset some of the money doled out now.

Also acting as a buffer is the ability to buy out a long term deal to a failed asset before the age of 26 (I believe) where the impact to AAV is the lowest. The quality of an org’s valuative ability also helps avert some risk.
 
Last edited:
To a point. Bridge deals can burn a GM just as well as some pointed out but when you have good indications of a rapidly rising cap, an early long term deal to a player dubbed a core asset, will help offset some of the money doled out now.

Also acting as a buffer is the ability to buy out a long term deal to a failed asset before the age of 26 (I believe) where the impact to AAV is the lowest. The quality of an org’s valuative ability also helps avert some risk.
Hughes would be very familiar with the 1/3 buyout option of young players (Colin White). Slaf is hopefully a long way from that territory.
 
Hughes would be very familiar with the 1/3 buyout option of young players (Colin White). Slaf is hopefully a long way from that territory.
Yup, I just brought it up to complete an argument in here but not to suggest in any manner that the org isn’t equipped or that it isn’t already aware of anything we throw out on the forum, on a daily basis. 💀
 
Yup, I just brought it up to complete an argument in here but not to suggest in any manner that the org isn’t equipped or that it isn’t already aware of anything we throw out on the forum, on a daily basis. 💀
It`s good to point that option out because don`t believe everyone is familiar with that type of buyout, it seems rare.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
smiley-emoji.gif



I wonder what Kenny told him... I will take your 8M back? Something like that?
Like it or not, reality is when you get paid big bucks, more will be expected, regardless of age!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
This is why I do not understand.He had chemistry and produced with Caufield and Suzuki. Why MSL wants to breakup the line?
He wanted secondary scoring which he actually got more from a Commitee of his 3 and 4th line instead. Basically to get Dach going. Unfortunately, all it did was made Slaf morph into Dach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee and Egresch
Oh, I will be on Slaf's ass game one next season :D
He is one of many, who we will expect to continue to develop into more.....
Of course this starts at the top and makes it's way into the dressing room. The hierarchy along with the coaches are not absolved from developing and doing better along the way................so that they too earn their crazy sums of $$$ also.

This is why I do not understand.He had chemistry and produced with Caufield and Suzuki. Why MSL wants to breakup the line?
MSL is always trying to get someone going.......................but he should not be messing with that line....
But putting a guy with Suzuki and CC will usually work.............but then someone getting dropped off the line seems to suffer..............
Dach needs to get going is the bottom line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee
To a point. Bridge deals can burn a GM just as well as some pointed out but when you have good indications of a rapidly rising cap, an early long term deal to a player dubbed a core asset, will help offset some of the money doled out now.

Also acting as a buffer is the ability to buy out a long term deal to a failed asset before the age of 26 (I believe) where the impact to AAV is the lowest. The quality of an org’s valuative ability also helps avert some risk.
I'm 100% sure if you could talk to KH about the contract like off the record as friend he would tell you that he signed the contract knowing Slaf would be overpaid for one year or two maybe three but he hope he'll be underpaid for the last 5-6 years of the contract when the team will be looking to win a cup and will want to avoid 9-10 millions contract as much a possible. People must realize that in 4 years (3 years into Slaf contract) a 7 millions contract will probably be common for good 2nd line players. Utah and post covid will likely make the cap rise a correction will happen.
 
Oh, I will be on Slaf's ass game one next season :D
That's it, knowing that your favorite Yoelle is not going to be back next year, you're taking it out on whoever is sure to be part of the roster. For shame. :sarcasm:

I'm 100% sure if you could talk to KH about the contract like off the record as friend he would tell you that he signed the contract knowing Slaf would be overpaid for one year or two maybe three but he hope he'll be underpaid for the last 5-6 years of the contract when the team will be looking to win a cup and will want to avoid 9-10 millions contract as much a possible.
It's a sound approach, IMHO. We see some baseball GMs doing the same, namely Alex Anthopoulos of the Braves.
 
That's it, knowing that your favorite Yoelle is not going to be back next year, you're taking it out on whoever is sure to be part of the roster. For shame. :sarcasm:


It's a sound approach, IMHO. We see some baseball GMs doing the same, namely Alex Anthopoulos of the Braves.
Stop laughing at Mario he's one of our only three players to be part of the 4 nations all star game.
 
Short meeting Hughes said

"Juraj this is going on your pre-game play list make sure you play it after the warm up"

Lazy - Deep Purple​

 
That's it, knowing that your favorite Yoelle is not going to be back next year, you're taking it out on whoever is sure to be part of the roster. For shame. :sarcasm:
You watch... Yoel will be re-signed for another 5 seasons. And Yoel is not greedy. He is quietly making a modest paycheck while loudly carrying this team on his back.
 
Last edited:
Cap management.

If you give him a 2-3 years bridge and he does well, you`re looking at a 10M+ contract with the growing cap and UFA years bought.
It's not a slam dunk though, of course I understand the logic behind it

Wouldn't it be better to sign Slaf to 10Mx8 contract when he's 23-24 than a 8Mx8 year contract when he's 21? With the cap going up it's probably the same % of the cap and he's UFA at 31-32 instead of 28.
 
It's not a slam dunk though, of course I understand the logic behind it

Wouldn't it be better to sign Slaf to 10Mx8 contract when he's 23-24 than a 8Mx8 year contract when he's 21? With the cap going up it's probably the same % of the cap and he's UFA at 31-32 instead of 28.
It's a 2-3 million difference per year on the 5-6 overlapping years of the deals.

Considering those overlapping years are likely Montreal's window, I would say no, it's not better.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad