Overkamp
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2007
- 3,694
- 24
Oilers running a huge psych op lolWell Broberg and Holloway no longer on the nhl.com Oilers roster...think that means something?
Oilers running a huge psych op lolWell Broberg and Holloway no longer on the nhl.com Oilers roster...think that means something?
Please explain why he's one of the bad GMs.Yeah because Florida has a great history of good GMs. Don’t be so emotional. Some teams have bad GMs. The sharks are one of them.
Were they on it earlier today?Well Broberg and Holloway no longer on the nhl.com Oilers roster...think that means something?
When I looked around 9am CST they were.Were they on it earlier today?
All RFA's appear to be gone from their teams. Unless there is some sort of massive deals happening with Jarvis, Seider and Swayman tooWere they on it earlier today?
Figured as much but figured I'd ask since I rarely go onto teams websites to check out their rosters.All RFA's appear to be gone from their teams. Unless there is some sort of massive deals happening with Jarvis, Seider and Swayman too
Its clearly no.No kidding.
But we're going down a bunch of tangents that have nothing to do with my point.
Is Broberg a better defenseman than Ceci as of right now? Yes or no.
Because everything he has done has been mediocre to garbage. Hertl’s retention was one of the dumbest things ever I’ve seen. He drafted Celebrini wow! That’s his only good move. Why don’t you tell me why he’s even considered “medicore” which would be a best case scenario.Please explain why he's one of the bad GMs.
It really isn't. As of today Ceci is the far better player. And cheaper.But that is up for debate on their most recent sample of games. Broberg outperformed him in the WCF and SCF. We'll see what this season has in store. I've pointed out various areas that Broberg excels in and laps Ceci by a mile in (puck retrieval, skating, and puck moving).
He absouletly did not. Look up the fancy stats. Broberg was last of the Oilers D.But that is up for debate on their most recent sample of games. Broberg outperformed him in the WCF and SCF. We'll see what this season has in store. I've pointed out various areas that Broberg excels in and laps Ceci by a mile in (puck retrieval, skating, and puck moving).
I could name a bunch of moves that worked but, tbh, would it even matter?Because everything he has done has been mediocre to garbage. Hertl’s retention was one of the dumbest things ever I’ve seen. He drafted Celebrini wow! That’s his only good move. Why don’t you tell me why he’s even considered “medicore” which would be a best case scenario.
What isn't up for debate is that Broberg outplayed Ceci in the playoff games they both played. What is up for debate is who will be better this season.It really isn't
"Fancy stats" show next to nothing in a sample that small. Especially when Broberg was playing with Nurse who was getting caved on "fancy stats" all playoffs.He absouletly did not. Look up the fancy stats. Broberg was last of the Oilers D.
It might be recency bias if I had ever supported the notion that Ceci was a valuable defender on a 2nd pairing. I've never supported that opinion and wanted him traded and upgraded on at the deadline.It really isn't. As of today Ceci is the far better player. And cheaper.
I'm not interested in recency bias.
If it's too small a sample to use the "fancy stats" then it's too small a sample to draw conclusions about Broberg's play period. Using any method."Fancy stats" show next to nothing in a sample that small. Especially when Broberg was playing with Nurse who was getting caved on "fancy stats" all playoffs.
What isn't up for debate is that Broberg outplayed Ceci in the playoff games they both played. What is up for debate is who will be better this season.
"Fancy stats" show next to nothing in a sample that small. Especially when Broberg was playing with Nurse who was getting caved on "fancy stats" all playoffs.
Yeah, and now we can’t upgrade Ceci because we sidegraded to keep a massive question mark in broberg.It might be recency bias if I had ever supported the notion that Ceci was a valuable defender on a 2nd pairing. I've never supported that opinion and wanted him traded and upgraded on at the deadline.
Cool, he's still better than Broberg overall going into the season. That's the point.It might be recency bias if I had ever supported the notion that Ceci was a valuable defender on a 2nd pairing. I've never supported that opinion and wanted him traded and upgraded on at the deadline.
I already stated we don't know what the season will hold. I said there's at least some viewings to suggest Broberg could be the better player this year as he was in that sample and got much better results.If it's too small a sample to use the "fancy stats" then it's too small a sample to draw conclusions about Broberg's play period. Using any method.
The Oilers don't need the better D man today. They need the better D in 7 months when the playoffs start. A lot of development can happen in that time, and Broberg hasn't even been signed yet.You cant prove anything based on 10 games, you can’t prove Broberg is better than Ceci based on 10 games either. But you can look at Ceci’s whole year and say yes, he’s better than what Broberg brought year. This could be different next year, or in 2 years, but that doesn’t matter, the Oilers need the better D man today.
So your saying you can’t prove that broberg was worse than Ceci on a 10 sample size, but that same 10 game sample size is enough to say that Broberg is better than Ceci?
Yeah, and now we can’t upgrade Ceci because we sidegraded to keep a massive question mark in broberg.
I don't really care about that. I care about what he would look like in 7 months in the playoffs if they even decide to match the offer. You keep pointing back to the start of the season when I've clearly outlined my point that development can happen quick once a young player has arrived in the NHL.Cool, he's still better than Broberg overall going into the season. That's the point.
Nobody makes the Cup finals by accident. Edmonton has been building to this. Third round exit to the Cup champs in Colorado, second round exit to the Cup champs in Vegas that said Edmonton was the toughest test they faced, now a loss in the Cup finals.Flukes happen all the time.
At this moment in time Ceci is a better defender than Broberg. Cheaper too.
This might change in the future, but considering Bouchard, McDavid and Draisaitl are all do for significant raises very soon, it sure doesn't help Edmonton's contention window this year or next, most likely.
I think they had pretty good GM in the past, and Grier is doing decent so far. Not great, not all the trades he has done has given full value coming their way, but its been hacking and whacking at making the team more set up for the future. Also put together a decent looking d-core that can handle themselves during teams transition and get some assets for them here and there if they play well. Obviously Sharks are thinking long term here.Some teams have bad GMs. The sharks are one of them.
I know development can happen at intervals outside a straight-line.I don't really care about that. I care about what he would look like in 7 months in the playoffs if they even decide to match the offer. You keep pointing back to the start of the season when I've clearly outlined my point that development can happen quick once a young player has arrived in the NHL.
He’s not “far better”. Ceci is more experienced and will be the safer bet, but provides nearly nothing past just being safe and serviceable. Broberg has much much higher potential, I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s better than Ceci as soon as mid season.It really isn't. As of today Ceci is the far better player. And cheaper.
I'm not interested in recency bias.
People point to Edmonton's low leverage (no cap, a deadline approaching), but the Sharks didn't have much leverage. They either get Ceci (who they want) and a 3rd-round pick, or they get nothing. What else are they going to do with that cap space?
Truth, the Sharks helped themselves out here by getting value out of Emberson. And also potentially more value out of a Ceci flip at the deadline. Trades are ALWAYS made to help BOTH teams, this is how every trade in the history of the NHL went down on some level. So anyone saying “why would the Blues help the Oilers cap” are f***in morons.People point to Edmonton's low leverage (no cap, a deadline approaching), but the Sharks didn't have much leverage. They either get Ceci (who they want) and a 3rd-round pick, or they get nothing. What else are they going to do with that cap space?