Confirmed Trade: [SJS/DET] Jake Walman and 2024 2nd round pick for future considerations

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,816
6,911
This isn't even squeezing every last drop. Sounds like no effort was made to see what he could get for Walman.
But who cares? At the end of the day the Red Wings swapped Gibson with Kiiskinen in order to dump Walman's contract. It's a nothing move.
 

RedHawkDown

still trying to trust the yzerplan
Aug 26, 2011
4,563
5,306
Canada
Boy I'm glad you don't call the shots.
I'm obviously worked up right now because I legitimately can't believe Yzerman has made such a boneheaded, poorly thought out move.

But on a separate and serious note, I do truly think that like at least 30% of the people here would be better general managers than like 50% of the league, at least when it comes to asset management and decision-making on players. There's a lot of nepotism in sports; the majority of these guys have very few management qualifications apart from having just played NHL hockey before. It's why a guy like Kyle Davidson can come in and be a very strong GM without very much playing experience at all, because that part doesn't really matter.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Trow

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,816
6,911
Because it's bad asset management. Assuming the rumors are true that Walman had value
Walman has negative value. The only halfway reputable source to report on this has been Frank Seravalli who said GMs were surprised at how significant the sweetener Detroit had to attach was, not that they were surprised a sweetener had to be attached in general.

So instead of calling up every team not on Walman's NTC to maybe offload his contract with a 3rd or 4th instead, Yzerman attached a 2nd and got it done immediately. The difference in value between those picks is ultimately insignificant.
 

Hammettf2b

oldmanyellsatcloud.jpg
Jul 9, 2012
22,627
4,750
So California
Walman has negative value. The only halfway reputable source to report on this has been Frank Seravalli who said GMs were surprised at how significant the sweetener Detroit had to attach was, not that they were surprised a sweetener had to be attached in general.

So instead of calling up every team not on Walman's NTC to maybe offload his contract with a 3rd or 4th instead, Yzerman attached a 2nd and got it done immediately. The difference in value between those picks is ultimately insignificant.
Then why not waivers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nut Upstrom

ZDH

Registered User
Mar 6, 2008
9,054
4,153
Vancouver just paid a 2nd to dump Mikyaev (retained 15%) which is similar to Walman's deal. Nobody is making a fuss about that.

Might be the cost of doing business.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,816
6,911
Then why not waivers?
Because no one would have claimed him. Walman has negative value on that contract. Again, the Seravalli report was not that GMs were interested in trading assets for him. Some of them were just surprised it took a 2nd to move him rather than a smaller sweetener.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueston

MonkeyBusiness

Registered User
Mar 3, 2013
4,444
1,272
People really upset at this dude celebrating? I'm 34 and can't wait to see my boy hit a griddy after he scores. God forbid someone show some personality and have fun in the NHL lmao
Calm down, don't get too worked up over different opinions than yours. People are allowed to hate his celebration, just like others can like it.
 

Hammettf2b

oldmanyellsatcloud.jpg
Jul 9, 2012
22,627
4,750
So California
Because no one would have claimed him. Walman has negative value on that contract. Again, the Seravalli report was not that GMs were interested in trading assets for him. Some of them were just surprised it took a 2nd to move him rather than a smaller sweetener.
Didn't other GMs say they would have paid to get Walman? How is that negative value?
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,816
6,911
Didn't other GMs say they would have paid to get Walman? How is that negative value?
Based on what? Some random podcaster’s “reporting”?

Seravalli didn’t say GMs would have paid to get Walman. He said some would have taken a lesser sweetener than a 2nd to acquire him.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,816
6,911
So Yzerman knew he wouldn't get claimed?
That’s the only logical conclusion. It’s not surprising either. We’re talking about a 28 year old who has only played two NHL seasons, the latest of which was a disaster, and is signed for $3.4M through 2026.
 

Hammettf2b

oldmanyellsatcloud.jpg
Jul 9, 2012
22,627
4,750
So California
That’s the only logical conclusion. It’s not surprising either. We’re talking about a 28 year old who has only played two NHL seasons, the latest of which was a disaster, and is signed for $3.4M through 2026.
The entire point of this argument is Yzerman doing his due diligence. Not be some wizard predicting the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
16,413
18,389
Vegass
Gotta give it up to Hodge, who only started caring about the player two days ago and is now suddenly the most knowledgeable Jake fan in the world.

Vancouver just paid a 2nd to dump Mikyaev (retained 15%) which is similar to Walman's deal. Nobody is making a fuss about that.

Might be the cost of doing business.
A 2027 pick doesn’t carry the same value.
 

SimonEdvinssonAtSix

It's possible to commit no mistakes and still lose
Nov 2, 2018
1,417
1,893
Detroit trades a dude for a dude + a 2nd, Detroit then trades Walman + 2nd for FC.

I just don't see the need for outrage here.
I think Detroit won the prospect swap and lost the Walman trade. WTF is the big deal?
 
  • Like
Reactions: OgeeOgelthorpe

gn2007

Registered User
Nov 21, 2009
3,905
1,514
Shelby Township, MI
Walman has negative value. The only halfway reputable source to report on this has been Frank Seravalli who said GMs were surprised at how significant the sweetener Detroit had to attach was, not that they were surprised a sweetener had to be attached in general.

So instead of calling up every team not on Walman's NTC to maybe offload his contract with a 3rd or 4th instead, Yzerman attached a 2nd and got it done immediately. The difference in value between those picks is ultimately insignificant.
San Jose would have picked him up on waivers like they did with goodrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nut Upstrom

Boud

Registered User
Dec 27, 2011
13,633
7,084
Detroit trades a dude for a dude + a 2nd, Detroit then trades Walman + 2nd for FC.

I just don't see the need for outrage here.
I think Detroit won the prospect swap and lost the Walman trade. WTF is the big deal?

Because trading a 2nd rounder to get rid of a good player on a good contract doesn't make any sense, even if you think the team won the trade to acquire the 2nd rounder.

Detroit had other worse players they could've unloaded and RHD come at a premium. It's puzzling and the reaction is not surprising at all.
 

iago

Registered User
Apr 2, 2024
15
10
Is he really that bad that they need to pay a 2nd??
Jake has all the physical talent you could ask for, and sometimes makes some brilliant plays, but, unfortunately, for every brilliant play he makes, he follows it up with one or two brutal mental errors. I was hoping they could dump him, but even I was surprised that it took a 2nd round sweetener to make it happen. If you want, check out his advanced stats - they are awful.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad