SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 14,924
- 14,113
But Knuble had 54 points in 64 games. Gagne only had 68 points in 76 games that year, it's not like he was head an shoulders above the rest of the team.Gagne peak, Seguin career
Gagne's was deadly in his b2b 40-goal seasons. One of those years he did it on a team where the 2nd leading scorer on Philly was 54-point Mike Knuble.
Seguin always had a better cast around him and obviously has had the better career with more games and points and a cup.
How do you argue Gagne for either really? I hear the defensive/overall argument, but he was never really that great defensively, never a threat for Selke consideration.Waiting for the Forsberg quote, Gagne career and peak, not only did he have the big goal seasons he was a two-way defensive beast, guy was just a better hockey player imo.
I'm a bit surprised Gagne is getting any votes here.
I don't normally use AINEC but I think it applies here.
Seguin was as good a goal scorer and a significantly better point producer who was actually competing for the Art Ross at some point. 2nd in PPG in 2014-15 but missed 11 games that put him out of the running
But Knuble had 54 points in 64 games. Gagne only had 68 points in 76 games that year, it's not like he was head an shoulders above the rest of the team.