Should the Senators trade Norris to get a replacement for Zub?

Norris4Norris

Registered User
Jul 13, 2022
495
359
Trading one player on a bad team for a bad player from another team makes no one better. It certainly doesn't make the Sens a playoff team unless we can trade Norris for McDavid or Hellebyuck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lancepitlick

HoweHullOrr

Registered User
Oct 3, 2013
11,898
2,385
I don't think it is a panic move. It's already been reported that they were shopping Norris last year prior to his injury.
Last year he had a shoulder injury, so wouldn’t that be more of a panic move? Maybe there’s some detail that is missing or left out?

There’s some incongruent thinking happening here. If people think there is re-injury potential, then how are we getting a good return for him, especially a legit defender to replace Zub?

Pick one theory/argument (whatever) and then be consistent and stick to it with the rest of the thinking (not you, its s general comment).
 

PlayOn

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
2,080
2,710
Last year he had a shoulder injury, so wouldn’t that be more of a panic move? Maybe there’s some detail that is missing or left out?

There’s some incongruent thinking happening here. If people think there is re-injury potential, then how are we getting a good return for him, especially a legit defender to replace Zub?

Pick one theory/argument (whatever) and then be consistent and stick to it with the rest of the thinking (not you, its s general comment).
They might just not believe in the player too much, injuries aside.

One thing that does worry me a bit about him is his puck distribution, or even receiving passes. He kind of always seems to be fighting just to maintain possession. Don’t know if his timing is off bc of injuries, strength is not there etc or what. He has 1 assist 5 on 5 this season playing with guys like Tkachuk or Batherson all year which is pretty crazy. In fairness to him he plays some hard minutes though.

The shooting, 200 ft game etc I think will continue to grow as he gets more settled. He doesn’t have to be the best playmaker in the world but as a C probably has to use his linemates better than he does currently to be successful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

PoutineSp00nZ

Electricity is really just organized lightning.
Jul 21, 2009
20,369
6,044
Ottawa
If you can get a legitimate 2nd pair defenseman, locked up, and roughly the same age as Norris you pull the trigger on that all day.

Love Zub, but the guy is made of glass. They need something else.

Definitely opens up a hole up front, but Pinto can play 2nd line center. Might need another 3rd line winger but those are much easier to find than defensemen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64

HoweHullOrr

Registered User
Oct 3, 2013
11,898
2,385
They might just not believe in the player too much, injuries aside.

One thing that does worry me a bit about him is his puck distribution, or even receiving passes. He kind of always seems to be fighting just to maintain possession. Don’t know if his timing is off bc of injuries, strength is not there etc or what. He has 1 assist 5 on 5 this season playing with guys like Tkachuk or Batherson all year which is pretty crazy. In fairness to him he plays some hard minutes though.

The shooting, 200 ft game etc I think will continue to grow as he gets more settled. He doesn’t have to be the best playmaker in the world but as a C probably has to use his linemates better than he does currently to be successful.
To me, Norris seems to be playing with some intensity and physicality. You could really see that in the last game (not the only one) I thought. There doesn’t appear to be any lingering injury issues (so far at least).

He’s on pace for about 60 points last I checked. I think his defensive game is decent but I haven’t dived deep into the stats.

But, a lot boils down to what the strategy is. Are they rebuilding, retooling, staying the course to the end of this season, or what. IDK.

If we think there’s injury risk, then you’d think NHL management would have the same thinking. In that case (if true), then not sure how trading Norris amounts to a needle moving asset coming back. Just having additional cap doesn’t automatically equate to improvement either. You have to attract and land that desired replacement player (not as easy for a small market Canadian team) and you have to target wisely. A few of the players we landed this off season have not been great if we need a recent example.

A lot of it boils down to strategy and the goals the team has. We can guess or speculate I suppose. Not sure anybody really knows though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayOn

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,451
3,528
Brampton
Definitely opens up a hole up front, but Pinto can play 2nd line center. Might need another 3rd line winger but those are much easier to find than defensemen.
Pretty much this. It's easier to fill out the bottom 6 than to fill out the top 4.

If we do move Norris and Pinto is promoted to 2C, guys like Cousins, Gaudette, Gregor, & McEwan will have more ice time and there might be more opportunity for guys Ostapchuk and Reinhardt.
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,231
4,433
Why would you expect him to score on those chances?
Because he is a good goal scorer
He had another one against Calgary that he put softly into Wolf’s pads. The guy is not a pure goal scorer
What?! I never use this, but it feels appropriate.

Have you even watched him?

He goes to the dirty areas, he tips pucks and gets rebounds. He ends up in spots to pot empty netters because he is a pure sniper and has a scorers instincts.
He can score when he is set up he has very good accuracy when one timing the puck he puts it places you wouldn’t expect.
Weird flex. That is the epitome of a goal scorer.
But one on one with goal.? He gets out dueled.
His wrist shot is deadly, and while I can't find the stats, I feel like his shoot-out % would be quite good. He would come in and just pick the corner.

Plus, he hasn't even used his 1-timer much this season, so when that confidence comes back, he will be a huge boon to the PP.
 

dumbdick

Galactic Defender
May 31, 2008
11,767
4,199
I wouldn't make a panic move to cover a roster spot for a season where they are likely not making the playoffs.
Jeez guy. There are 61 games left to play. And this team has played some of it's most complete games in years so far this season.

Let a little sunshine into your heart, Lance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Karlsson

lancepitlick

Registered User
Nov 20, 2016
430
497
P
Jeez guy. There are 61 games left to play. And this team has played some of it's most complete games in years so far this season.

Let a little sunshine into your heart, Lance.

If they have played their most complete games in years and are third worst in the division, that doesn't seem like a team that should be making short term moves.

Kidding around, they have been playing a lot better.
 

Nac Mac Feegle

wee & free
Jun 10, 2011
35,495
9,894
All depends how much faith you have in Pinto as a long term 2C. And how much (or how little) faith you have in Norris' shoulder.

Honestly, I'm not sold on either one...but I also don't think we'll get good value in a trade. So, I'd rather not make a move, than make the wrong one.

Unless another GM loses his mind and offers us a great deal it might be best to sit tight for a bit. It might already be too late to try and chase the playoffs this year, but we also don't want to fall too far back and give up a top 10-12 pick, either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

robsenz

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,614
2,486
All depends how much faith you have in Pinto as a long term 2C. And how much (or how little) faith you have in Norris' shoulder.

Honestly, I'm not sold on either one...but I also don't think we'll get good value in a trade. So, I'd rather not make a move, than make the wrong one.

Unless another GM loses his mind and offers us a great deal it might be best to sit tight for a bit. It might already be too late to try and chase the playoffs this year, but we also don't want to fall too far back and give up a top 10-12 pick, either.
I have no faith in either. If you can get Norris off the books for anything reasonable, you do it. We've seen his peak NHL career.
 

Nac Mac Feegle

wee & free
Jun 10, 2011
35,495
9,894
I have no faith in either. If you can get Norris off the books for anything reasonable, you do it. We've seen his peak NHL career.

Maybe...but the cap is also going to skyrocket over the next two years....that's if Andy & Co are willing to continue to be a cap team when the cap breaks the $100 mil ceiling. Suddenly the $8 mil contracts we have on the books don't look bad at all (and Baths contract is that much better).

Assuming they want to run with this core for the next few years.
 

BonHoonLayneCornell

Registered User
Oct 16, 2006
17,030
12,068
Yukon
Maybe...but the cap is also going to skyrocket over the next two years....that's if Andy & Co are willing to continue to be a cap team when the cap breaks the $100 mil ceiling. Suddenly the $8 mil contracts we have on the books don't look bad at all (and Baths contract is that much better).

Assuming they want to run with this core for the next few years.
Batherson will be expiring by then.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad