I'm not a Pens fan. You would know much better than me.Upgrading a 3rd to a 2nd for a goalie we don't need and getting an expiring deal? I don't think he'd get roasted.
I'm not a Pens fan. You would know much better than me.Upgrading a 3rd to a 2nd for a goalie we don't need and getting an expiring deal? I don't think he'd get roasted.
Good pro scouting is Roslovic and Robinson. We had a "healthy" Anderson and Pyotr, Neither Stolarz or Thompson would want to play 3rd/Ahl'r. Sucks to be where we're at with both going down, but a knock at our pro scouting aint it.Had Carolina excercised some good pro scouting, stolarz and thompson were both avail via free agency and they decided to keep the injury prone whose won nothing andersen
Matt Murray for a conditional 6th based on playing 10 + games. Otherwise future considerations. Low risk for both sides and could actually help the canes if Murray pans out at all.
Another use for the Raise Cane spell.
The problem is that Carolina would need retention and SJ has no slots.
I love any opportunity to say, Weekesy!I love breaks like this where someone claims inside sources on the most obvious thing in the world.
(yes I realize it’s Weekes and he does actually have sources, but come on)
Reading some more on Blackwood, I'm not sure he'd be a good fit in Carolina.San Jose also has a plethora of cap space if you need to offload some salary to make the numbers work.
1st is too high. There’s something here to make a deal but not at that valuationChicago & Mrazek makes sense given their situation with Soderblom and Broissot (Arvid is getting very close to games played max making him eligible for waivers if demoted).
However, they do NOT know when Broissot will return. Carolina likely has to wait for that issue to be resolved.
Otherwise, Chicago can absorb Andersons contract. The issue is: is Carolina OK with TWO years of Mrazek?
IF Chicago takes Andersson’s contract, you’re likely looking at a 2026 1st + mid level prospect return from Carolina.
Reading some more on Blackwood, I'm not sure he'd be a good fit in Carolina.
Is it fair to say he has consistency issues? Will play really well for a couple games where you would think he's legit starter material, but then play really poorly?
Secondly, like most goalies, he seems to do his best when seeing a lot of rubber. Makes sense as it keeps a goalie in the game and focused. The Canes are a team that does not allow a lot of shots, 2nd least in the NHL (best CA/60 in the NHL) so goalies don't see a lot of rubber consistently.
Thirdly, his HDSV%. The way Carolina plays is that they don't give up a lot of shots, but when their system breaks down, they give up HD chances. So while their 5v5 CA/60 is best in the NHL, their HDCA/60 is ranked 17th in then NHL. Goalies have to go from ice cold to stopping a break-away.
Admittedly, this is a tough situation for any goalie. Go through stretches without any action then suddenly having to face a high danger scoring chance. Over last season and this one to date, Andersen has the best 5v5 HDSV% in the NHL and Kochetkov has the 4th best. Raanta and Martin's HDSV% has been very poor over this stretch playing behind the same skaters.
I suspect the Canes, who are heavy into analytics, look for goalie candidates who might excel in this environment and would focus on those goalies, whoever they may be.