Should Steve Yzerman be fired?

Fired?

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 37.5%
  • No

    Votes: 40 62.5%

  • Total voters
    64

Nogatco Rd

Pierre-Luc Dubas
Apr 3, 2021
2,984
5,601
People voting NO, are you for real ?
Yeah, pretty easy call IMO. Early returns are a bit underwhelming but I think it makes sense to wait another year or two to see how their prospects look once graduated to the NHL.

That said, their pro scouting has been pretty bad... Is Steve Yzerman willing to fire Chris Yzerman?

Former Detroit Tigers GM Al Avila once traded his own son, might be time for Steve to give his bro the boot. Maybe wait until after the holidays though, could make for an awkward thanksgiving
 

centipede2233

Registered User
Sep 13, 2010
4,752
5,301
Ken holland left that team in shambles. It’ll be 5 yrs in april since yzerman arrived. He needs a few more years imho. Like I said, most cases 5 yrs should be enough time but this team was horrific with ugly contracts and piss poor drafting ie. Zadina, mantha
 

tabness

be a playa 🇵🇸
Apr 4, 2014
2,942
5,278
Yzerman is basically unfireable in the foreseeable future unless he like gropes an intern or something.

Never seen a GM that most of the team's fans are still supporting that gets as much criticism from those who aren't Wings fans as Yzerman though, appreciate the concern for the Wings though lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJoe88

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,206
10,840
Ken holland left that team in shambles. It’ll be 5 yrs in april since yzerman arrived. He needs a few more years imho. Like I said, most cases 5 yrs should be enough time but this team was horrific with ugly contracts and piss poor drafting ie. Zadina, mantha
It'll be six years in April not five. It's been long enough that you can stop blaming Holland. This is fully Yzerman's team at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeyMike01

Yozhik v tumane

Registered User
Jan 2, 2019
2,026
2,171
Ken holland left that team in shambles. It’ll be 5 yrs in april since yzerman arrived. He needs a few more years imho. Like I said, most cases 5 yrs should be enough time but this team was horrific with ugly contracts and piss poor drafting ie. Zadina, mantha

I actually misremembered that as Yzerman’s first draft, however it was Holland’s last one.

At any rate, I think I remember correctly that at the time, the 2018 first round where Zadina and Veleno fell from their projected draft positions were considered huge wins for the Red Wings.

Check out this thread for contemporary commentary on the Zadina pick and this one for Veleno, it’s pretty funny.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,857
16,660
Sweden
It'll be six years in April not five. It's been long enough that you can stop blaming Holland. This is fully Yzerman's team at this point.
6 years isn’t long in real terms. Nearly every good team in the NHL right now is built mostly on pre-2019 picks. The only way to say 6 years is long enough is to abandon any plan to build through the draft.
 

Tatar Shots

Registered User
Feb 2, 2014
5,863
1,931
Yzerman’s first round picks have all looked great in the NHL so far and there is great depth and intriguing players in the prospect pool. Through trades he turned Mantha into Cossa, Bertuzzi into DeBrincat, and Hronek into Sandin-Pellikka. The depth player signings during the rebuild are leaving quite a bit to be desired right now, but the rebuild is clearly trending in the right direction. Lalonde needs to go, but zero reason Yzerman should be fired because the depth players he signed during the rebuild aren’t working out right now. I think it’s still a case of people misunderstanding how long it takes to fully rebuild a team with nearly zero talent on the roster or in the prospect pool.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad