Proposal: Should Rangers trade one of Laf/Kakko for a cup run ?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

boredmale

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2005
42,559
7,111
I said before the season the Rangers should have went all out for Eichel and offered Laf, he is exactly what they needed. Elite #1 centers generally don't come up on the market that often(like every 5+ years)
 

Baby Punisher

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 30, 2012
7,540
1,779
Staten Island, NY
The sooner they realize it, the better, but they have two upcoming busts on their hands.

Both Kakko and Lafreniere are not living up to their potential and on many nights look so bad that one would think the only reason they’re playing is their draft status.

However, besides them, New York Rangers are composed extremely well and it shows with standings.

The Rangers are one - two key pieces away from a cup run. I believe they need one top 4 defender and a top 6 RW to go all the way.

Is it time to ship Laf or Kakko to Arizona to get Chuchryn ? Or are there other good deals ?
These guys were billed as Malkin and Crosby and what we got are Daige and Faloon.
 

JoemAvs

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
13,671
4,116
The time to trade one of them (++++) was when Eichel was on the market.
Sure Pegula and the Sabres really did not want to see him play in New York but considering for how little he ultimately got dealt, the Rangers could have easily made an offer they couldn't refuse built around one of these guys as the centerpiece. I have a feeling the Rangers will regret not doing that for quite a while in the future considering the career trajectory of these 2 (don't expect them to bust but I also do not really expect any of them to turn into superstar players anylonger).

Now they are stuck with what I believe is an ugly contract in Zibanejads mega extension and their youth they have been so in love with is not getting the time/development needed and is losing value while they still don't look like a serious contender (even though they have the goalie to take them far IMO so I could actually see them make a cinderella run that takes them far) and their key guys in Panarin/Trouba/Kreider/Zib that are on megabucks are getting older and once Fox gets paid they will be in caphell as well.
 

is the answer jesus

Registered User
Mar 10, 2008
6,623
3,157
Tonawanda, NY
The time to trade one of them (++++) was when Eichel was on the market.
Sure Pegula and the Sabres really did not want to see him play in New York but considering for how little he ultimately got dealt, the Rangers could have easily made an offer they couldn't refuse built around one of these guys as the centerpiece. I have a feeling the Rangers will regret not doing that for quite a while in the future considering the career trajectory of these 2 (don't expect them to bust but I also do not really expect any of them to turn into superstar players anylonger).

Now they are stuck with what I believe is an ugly contract in Zibanejads mega extension and their youth they have been so in love with is not getting the time/development needed and is losing value while they still don't look like a serious contender (even though they have the goalie to take them far IMO so I could actually see them make a cinderella run that takes them far) and their key guys in Panarin/Trouba/Kreider/Zib that are on megabucks are getting older and once Fox gets paid they will be in caphell as well.
I don't know that either player would have held all that much appeal to Buffalo especially as a centerpiece. If there's one strength in Buffalo's pipeline it's on the wings. I think they prioritized getting someone they thought could be a long-term top 6 center in the Eichel deal and the best package they could get that included a player with that ceiling was that Vegas package with Krebs in it.
 

jay from jersey

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
6,313
4,653
I don't know that either player would have held all that much appeal to Buffalo especially as a centerpiece. If there's one strength in Buffalo's pipeline it's on the wings. I think they prioritized getting someone they thought could be a long-term top 6 center in the Eichel deal and the best package they could get that included a player with that ceiling was that Vegas package with Krebs in it.
The time to trade one of them (++++) was when Eichel was on the market.
Sure Pegula and the Sabres really did not want to see him play in New York but considering for how little he ultimately got dealt, the Rangers could have easily made an offer they couldn't refuse built around one of these guys as the centerpiece. I have a feeling the Rangers will regret not doing that for quite a while in the future considering the career trajectory of these 2 (don't expect them to bust but I also do not really expect any of them to turn into superstar players anylonger).

Now they are stuck with what I believe is an ugly contract in Zibanejads mega extension and their youth they have been so in love with is not getting the time/development needed and is losing value while they still don't look like a serious contender (even though they have the goalie to take them far IMO so I could actually see them make a cinderella run that takes them far) and their key guys in Panarin/Trouba/Kreider/Zib that are on megabucks are getting older and once Fox gets paid they will be in caphell as well.

nyr likely had a better offer in place...
It’s really not a coincidence that we have the same amount of cap space still available this season that could have fit eichel.
The pegulas/Adams didn’t want to deal Eichel to an East team, let alone another NY team and watch him have success there.
I’m higher on LaF then I am on kakko. LaF already has a lot of stuff that’s going to make for a real solid player. Shot/size/physical, etc but he needs top 6 minutes and he needs to work on his lower leg strength/skating.
He’s not getting that extra second or 2 of separation to get that great wrister off. There’s no explosion in his feet.
The good thing is it’s not terribly hard to fix. We saw kakko literally become a tremendous skater from a terrible one in a year. So I’m hoping LaF has a similar offseason.
LaF imo can absolutely still be a PPG wing. But I think kakko will get to that offensively. I could be wrong.... but LaF just has better hands/shot/vision imo
 
Last edited:

Stubu

Registered User
Dec 16, 2015
4,097
4,758
F.
http://...X9f60z1r9g2SvBFiROMSYyOpIGOJkyZMY1Mm5kBj/2Q== http://...md7RRQIf9ENxxK8UUV/STORRRQiijWnYopwyKKKccf//Z
Laf for Buchnevich?
Nah, Kakko for Kravtsov.

[Edit: Jebus, what did you have in there?]
 

wintersej

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 26, 2011
22,910
18,432
North Andover, MA
Except Seguin was traded for other reasons if I recall correctly. He had 67 points in his 2nd season. Neither Laf or Kakko are putting up anywhere close to those numbers so I have my doubts if we have another Seguin specifically on our hands. I probably wouldn't trade them though, you'd just be selling low.

67 points in a system that meant that was best on the team. Seguin is an awful comparison. Seguin was a good player that they didn’t think should be “the franchise”.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,052
11,273
I said before the season the Rangers should have went all out for Eichel and offered Laf, he is exactly what they needed. Elite #1 centers generally don't come up on the market that often(like every 5+ years)
Wouldn’t have mattered. Pegula didn’t want Buffalo sending him to the Rangers, especially after the billboards. Wouldn’t pick up the phone.
 

Columbus Jack

He's from Columbus
Nov 25, 2009
10,853
1,838
PA
67 points in a system that meant that was best on the team. Seguin is an awful comparison. Seguin was a good player that they didn’t think should be “the franchise”.
If you read what I wrote I basically said comparing Laf/Kakko to Seguin is a terrible comparison. He had already accomplished a lot more than those two in his 2nd season.
 

Zach716

Pucks in deep
Nov 24, 2018
4,432
5,000
they should have traded both for Eichel lol now both of them keep trending towards Bust nation
I remember when a big chunk of their fanbase absolutely balked at including not both, but even just 1 of them in a potential deal. Now Vegas is gonna have a top 5 center to go on a run for the next 5 years. The bluest of blue chips!
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,309
4,013
Da Big Apple
I remember when a big chunk of their fanbase absolutely balked at including not both, but even just 1 of them in a potential deal. Now Vegas is gonna have a top 5 center to go on a run for the next 5 years. The bluest of blue chips!

Happy to have both KK and LaF and see how that works out over the next 5 yrs given cap hit and Eich neck, which thank God, presumably is 111% healed but going forward this is a pricey asset at risk from one solid hit
 

KingKempe9

Registered User
Feb 18, 2019
46
20
Laf to Kings would be good. We don't have much on wings coming through. Have plenty of centre and D prospects we could swap. A few of Vilardi ,Turcotte, JAD Kupari, Madden, Grans etc. Not sure if 2 or 3 good centre/D prospects would be a good swap
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,768
18,741
I like the idea of Laf to Philly. No idea on the return, but Giroux would be part of it. I just figure Philly needs someone to build around, Laf could maybe use a fresh start. Either that or the Stars, those are the two teams that just a complete redo around a young potential star player.
 

Perennial

Registered User
Jun 27, 2020
3,492
1,523
All options should be explored... whether they should trade them depends entirely on the return
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad