HockeyVirus
Woll stan.
- Nov 15, 2020
- 19,358
- 29,564
Kind of a different answer than what we usually get from players. Is there a chance he leaves the Rangers? Previously it was reported he wants 12M AAV on a new deal
Last edited:
Paying someone to take the last year of Trouba and resigning Shesty at $11-12mil-ish seems like the ultra-realistic plan.32 thoughts podcast today went into it and basically said the Rangers will sign Shesterkin and Trouba won't be back.
I think top end goalies should get paid and break records.I think $12 million for any goalie is ridiculous, but if any goalie has the right to ask for a record breaking contract, it's absolutely Shesterkin.
If it gets done, I'm guessing it would be like 8 years at $11 million AAV.
it might have to be a buyout depending on how airtight trouba's NTC isPaying someone to take the last year of Trouba and resigning Shesty at $11-12mil-ish seems like the ultra-realistic plan.
Bobs makes $10.5mil and I think Shesty is better and obviously younger and on the upswing. At the end of the day, $12mil isn't THAT far-fetched even though it churns my stomach to think about giving a goalie that much. He's earned it, though.
I think $12 million for any goalie is ridiculous, but if any goalie has the right to ask for a record breaking contract, it's absolutely Shesterkin.
If it gets done, I'm guessing it would be like 8 years at $11 million AAV.
32 thoughts podcast today went into it and basically said the Rangers will sign Shesterkin and Trouba won't be back.
dude carried the rangers hard
11m is the floor for him
If the rags don’t give him 12 who else would? Doubt many teams would be willing to trade what it would take and then sign him to a contract like that.
Presumably you wouldn't trade for him.If the rags don’t give him 12 who else would? Doubt many teams would be willing to trade what it would take and then sign him to a contract like that.
Not airtight. He’s turned his partial no trade into a no move with how his agent has stated that he wouldn’t report to another team.it might have to be a buyout depending on how airtight trouba's NTC is
Oddly, top goalie contracts haven't really risen as all others have. Since Price and Bob signed their $10M+ contracts 5+ years ago, Hellebuyck, Vasilevsky, Sorokin and Saros have all signed as top of the crop goaltenders, and they all signed for cap hits in the range $7.74M (Saros) to $9.5M (Vasilevsky).Other positions are going up. Not sure about $12M, but him wanting more than Vasilevskiy's $9.5M probably isn't unfounded.
I think Vasilevskiy's cap % was around 11.66%. That percentage next year would be ~$10.7M
Anaheim, Calgary, Columbus, San Jose. Those are the teams able to do it today without having to free up space or very little space.If the rags don’t give him 12 who else would? Doubt many teams would be willing to trade what it would take and then sign him to a contract like that.
Fair, but that changes it to the same thing no? Where it forces the rangers to buy him out unless a team is trading for him with the understanding that they will have to buy him out (but that second option would cost more than someone taking on trouba as a cap dump)There’s nothing odd about anything said there. Not sure what the OP is trying to get it. It doesn’t sound like a remotely controversial thing to say.
Not airtight. He’s turned his partial no trade into a no move with how his agent has stated that he wouldn’t report to another team.
That was only for this season. Apparently Lady Trouba was the driver for this year’s decision because she has a year left on her medical residency.Fair, but that changes it to the same thing no? Where it forces the rangers to buy him out unless a team is trading for him with the understanding that they will have to buy him out (but that second option would cost more than someone taking on trouba as a cap dump)