Rosso Scuderia
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2012
- 9,932
- 4,115
Budget team vs non budget teams
I agree with most things you said here but you REALLY think it has to do with the budget of the team and not individual performance? Come on man..
Budget team vs non budget teams
Vegas was 4 mil under the cap last year.
Individual performance or performances of individuals?I agree with most things you said here but you REALLY think it has to do with the budget of the team and not individual performance? Come on man..
I agree with most things you said here but you REALLY think it has to do with the budget of the team and not individual performance? Come on man..
I think Subban or Weber aside the predators are a better team today than they were years ago.
I do think team performance is important in advancing in the playoffs.
What is incorrect about that?
I gave you an example of a team that didn't spend to the cap but that's not good enough for you and you offer me a condesending reply because it doesn't fit your narrative.Do you know what low budget means?
Thats right. My point is you don't have to spend to the cap if you have really good young players.Vegas had a PPG center too.
The majority of the Monteal media are shills for the Habs so of course they will. When the trade was made they ran Subban through the ringer to justify this trade. This is just more of the same sad justification.I missed last night but surely he wasn't that good. Right?
And the media, Engels and Basu in particular, have made it their mission to praise Weber's intangible intangibles with intangible and inscrutable side references to his mythical and intangible aura. It's bound to trickle to the audience and inevitable that it would get overblown.
Namely PKThat's a 17.XX goal per season pace over 82 games.
Many defensemen never score 17 goals over a full season, ever.
None of them had their intangibles raised to a mythical level like Weber's though...
Never heard anybody say that all Nik Lidstrom has to do is to give a stare to his linemates in order to improve..
Lol, Lidstrom is the mythical king. He earned the nickname the perfect human. He was elevated so far above his actual play level that people believe he was the best player on the Redwings, even though its factually untrue, from Fedorov, Yzerman, to Zetterbergs career year and to Datsyuk, he was never the best. Yet, people still claim he is and have him ranked as the best defender ever. Bad comparison. Another one that benefitted from that was Doughty.None of them had their intangibles raised to a mythical level like Weber's though...
Never heard anybody say that all Nik Lidstrom has to do is to give a stare to his linemates in order to improve..
I gave you an example of a team that didn't spend to the cap and that's not good enough for you and you offer me a condesending reply because it doesn't fit your narrative.
Year | League Cap | League Floor | Nashville | Delta Cap | Delta Floor | Playoff Result |
2007 | 50,300,000.00 | 34,300,000.00 | 35,861,700.00 | 14,438,300.00 | 1,561,700.00 | Round 1 |
2008 | 56,700,000.00 | 40,700,000.00 | 45,436,800.00 | 11,263,200.00 | 4,736,800.00 | DNQ |
2009 | 56,800,000.00 | 40,800,000.00 | 44,767,800.00 | 12,032,200.00 | 3,967,800.00 | Round 1 |
2010 | 59,400,000.00 | 43,400,000.00 | 52,210,600.00 | 7,189,400.00 | 8,810,600.00 | Round 2 |
2011 | 64,300,000.00 | 48,300,000.00 | 51,932,000.00 | 12,368,000.00 | 3,632,000.00 | Round 2 |
2012 | 70,200,000.00 | 44,000,000.00 | 54,831,900.00 | 15,368,100.00 | 10,831,900.00 | DNQ |
2013 | 64,300,000.00 | 47,500,000.00 | 62,562,000.00 | 1,738,000.00 | 15,062,000.00 | DNQ |
2014 | 69,000,000.00 | 51,000,000.00 | 61,920,700.00 | 7,079,300.00 | 10,920,700.00 | Round 1 |
2015 | 71,400,000.00 | 52,800,000.00 | 63,124,736.00 | 8,275,264.00 | 10,324,736.00 | Round 2 |
2016 | 73,000,000.00 | 54,000,000.00 | 68,151,361.00 | 4,848,639.00 | 14,151,361.00 | Round 4 |
2017 | 75,000,000.00 | 55,400,000.00 | 70,488,163.00 | 4,511,837.00 | 15,088,163.00 | Round 2 |
Weber played with Suter, Josi and other decent D at times, does not compare to OEL at all, and he was playing in front of Rinne, not Ranta or Smith before...
besides, we've read so many times how godly Weber is, so why the quality of the team he plays for is used as an excuse ?
The prophecy of Webers decline has been around since 2012... its bound to happen soon enough now.I notice the only criticisms of Weber are imaginary. His decline remains an imaginary future event that hasn't actually happened on the ice yet. His 'myth', 'stare', 'aura', etc. are deliberately wild terms that were coined by his critics so they can turn around and mock them.
Weber -- the actual player, not the imaginary metaphor -- has been really good for the Habs, including his performance in our brief 6-game playoff series.
The guy isn't an offensive D-man and lead his team in points some years. How can you discount how weak the team had to be?
Name me the plethora of low budget teams that made finals in the cap era.
I missed most of last night's game (thankfully!) so I can't comment on who played well/badly.I missed last night but surely he wasn't that good. Right?
And the media, Engels and Basu in particular, have made it their mission to praise Weber's intangible intangibles with intangible and inscrutable side references to his mythical and intangible aura. It's bound to trickle to the audience and inevitable that it would get overblown.
I missed most of last night's game (thankfully!) so I can't comment on who played well/badly.
As for the media descriptions, I've heard people talk about Weber's leadership, but I've never heard words like "Myth", "Legend", "Flawless", "Legend", etc. The only time I've seen those terms used are from people who intentionally set them up like bowling pins, so they have something to knock down.
Nothing about draft ranks in my post, try again.Using Weber's draft ranking is a pretty weak argument. I can recall several notable defenseman taken in later rounds.
Sure. But the PO success argument isn't privy to Weber. Alfredsson, Ovechkin, Yzerman, and many others have had their leadership questioned for their team's lack of success in the POs.Yeah that's a dumb thing to say, just like the playoff PPG and team post season success arguments are equally dumb to be used against him.
Not because of his intangibles no.Bobby Orr wasn't mythical in the hockey world when he played....ok then
Lol, Lidstrom is the mythical king. He earned the nickname the perfect human. He was elevated so far above his actual play level that people believe he was the best player on the Redwings, even though its factually untrue, from Fedorov, Yzerman, to Zetterbergs career year and to Datsyuk, he was never the best. Yet, people still claim he is and have him ranked as the best defender ever. Bad comparison. Another one that benefitted from that was Doughty.
Nieds also.
I did.Never heard anyone say that about Weber either.