Nah, if Kessel can't handle the Canadian hockey media then how's he going to handle the bay area hockey media?
You mean Kevin Kurz and the other two writers?
I dunno how our guys do it.
Nah, if Kessel can't handle the Canadian hockey media then how's he going to handle the bay area hockey media?
Well if the war room zoomed in and saw that part of the puck was still on the line, that would be conclusive evidence against it, no?
Don't get too twisted. They have played 75% of their games on the road and are still in playoff position I believe, or just out of it. They are a playoff team. But they do need a lot of work.
Looking at who they lost to, and how they played those games doesn't give me confidence that they'll suddenly start winning once on home ice.
You mean Kevin Kurz and the other two writers?
I dunno how our guys do it.
Must be why they look so beat up on gamedays. So many heavy-hitting, tough questions
There was no such evidence. The best view was inside the net cam but there is a HUGE gap in visibility from when it is just about to cross the line and when the d-man's stick swept it away. You never see how far the puck goes into the net at its max, so no evidence to overturn.
I demand Worcester callups!
Kevin Kurza goes way WAY inside.
edit: I'm leaving his name spelled wrong. I DGAF anymore.
Waive Burish/McGinn and Hannan/Irwin, bring up Hamilton & Fedun:
48-19-57
12-39-83
15-8-81
89-75-25
44-88
41-61
Fedun-5 (I can't remember what number Fedun wore)
That's a youth movement I can get behind.
I just disagree. Top of the net was the best angle I thought, and Toronto probably did more than CSN (which didn't do anything) to get a better look. Frame-by-frame, zooming in, to show that the puck never completely crossed.
Yeah he's not saving anything.
Is anyone even actually angry? This team isn't that good.
Is anyone even actually angry? This team isn't that good.