spintops
Registered User
- Sep 13, 2013
- 1,858
- 1,979
I thought moving Eklund to draft Stenberg #2 overall is bad asset management, because IDK that Stenberg is going to be that much better than Eklund. But if you are able to land a Smits at #9 I guess I can see the vision.
Stenberg + Smits > Eklund + Reid? I guess if you have all the dmen rated close enough. Or maybe Mike shocks us and takes 2 Dmen, if one of them pans out into a true 1D you are happy TBH.
Stenberg + Smits > Eklund + Reid? I guess if you have all the dmen rated close enough. Or maybe Mike shocks us and takes 2 Dmen, if one of them pans out into a true 1D you are happy TBH.




