Last season went just fine. He got 9 games against NHL competition and I’m sure he learned a ton from it. Then they sent him back to Sweden where he could get some games and more importantly have time to add some muscle. Do you think it was a bad thing that he played those 9 games?He “earned a spot” last season and how did that go? Preseason performance is meaningless at best and actively misleading at worst when it comes to judging a prospect’s NHL readiness.
The vast majority of 19 year old hockey players should not be in the NHL until they prove they can dominate a lower pro league. Eklund’s long term development is infinitely more important than winning games this season. If Trevor Zegras can begin his D+2 season in the AHL so can Eklund.
You say preseason game performance is meaningless but playing well in the AHL shows a young player is ready. The best players in the AHL are the ones that are busting their butt in preseason games trying to make their team. In fact, the best ones make their NHL teams so you don’t play against them in the AHL. Plus there are lots of veterans giving their all to try and remain NHL players or earn additional ice time.
You say the vast majority of 19 year olds aren’t ready for the NHL. I agree. I notice that you didn’t say all, so you know that some are ready. How do you think teams should determine who is ready? I think you should let them compete for the jobs in camp and preseason.