Toggle sidebar

Confirmed with Link: Sharks acquire Timothy Liljegren from Maple Leafs for Matt Benning, conditional 3rd and 6th

hotcabbagesoup

hotcabbagesoup

"I'm going to get what I deserve" -RutgerMcgroarty
Feb 18, 2009
10,765
14,870
Reno, Nevada
At least he's not in denial about there being competition, not playing well in camp, needing confidence.

His play on the ice to me has some cockiness/arrogance to it but the way he speaks doesnt show any of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
timorous me

timorous me

Gristled Veteran
Apr 14, 2010
2,257
3,746
Le Rosbeef said:
It's the only thing of any value we sent back. I have no problem with a 3rd - they don't often become top 4 Dmen.
Click to expand...
And it's not even our third; it's likely to be pretty low since it's Edmonton's or Colorado's. So we're talking what, a pick in the 80s, probably? Not a big deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Pinkfloyd

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,443
15,124
Folsom
timorous me said:
And it's not even our third; it's likely to be pretty low since it's Edmonton's or Colorado's. So we're talking what, a pick in the 80s, probably? Not a big deal.
Click to expand...
The 3rd round pick level is my limit when it comes to using the pick in a seemingly frivolous manner. 3rd-7th I really tend to not care what it's used for as long as it's not someone that is seemingly a rental. The 2nd round picks and higher need to be for players that are pretty decidedly going to be part of the long term plans of the team. Using a 3rd on someone with an extra year that can be at least a 3rd pairing contributor is fine with me. I'd still prefer the 3rd rounders but not going to worry about it like I would 2nd rounders or 1st rounders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Celly4Celebrini

Celly4Celebrini

pray
Jul 10, 2010
5,745
731
Pinkfloyd said:
The 3rd round pick level is my limit when it comes to using the pick in a seemingly frivolous manner. 3rd-7th I really tend to not care what it's used for as long as it's not someone that is seemingly a rental. The 2nd round picks and higher need to be for players that are pretty decidedly going to be part of the long term plans of the team. Using a 3rd on someone with an extra year that can be at least a 3rd pairing contributor is fine with me. I'd still prefer the 3rd rounders but not going to worry about it like I would 2nd rounders or 1st rounders.
Click to expand...
i tend toward if it was our 3rd that could have been used to jump back into round 2, then id be more concerned. After pick 80 its just kinda whatever. Those can be acquired for 4ths+ and no one is turning down a trade up in round 1 over a late 3rd rounder.
 

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,461
1,853
Hodge said:
Contrary? All the more reason we should have squeezed them harder. Toronto absolutely needed to dump Liljegren more than we needed to get him.
Click to expand...
One thing Grier is good at that can frustrate fans is that he doesn’t need to “win” every part of a trade. He often pays appropriate fair market prices which could explain why he is able to make these obvious trades happen.

Most of his trades are not surprising moves and have often been discussed by fans. He probably realized that Liljegren is an upgrade over Benning and a late 3rd is not an essential piece for the rebuild. He could have potentially gotten Toronto to accept a worse pick, but that could also risk losing out on a deal which makes the team better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan and coooldude
Hodge

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,642
7,902
gaucholoco3 said:
One thing Grier is good at that can frustrate fans is that he doesn’t need to “win” every part of a trade. He often pays appropriate fair market prices which could explain why he is able to make these obvious trades happen.

Most of his trades are not surprising moves and have often been discussed by fans. He probably realized that Liljegren is an upgrade over Benning and a late 3rd is not an essential piece for the rebuild. He could have potentially gotten Toronto to accept a worse pick, but that could also risk losing out on a deal which makes the team better.
Click to expand...
I completely disagreed with fans and media who were ripping Grier for not "maximizing value" on the Burns, Meier, Karlsson and Hertl trades. We desperately needed to dump those contracts (and avoid extending Meier) so quibbling with the returns and retention% was missing the forest for the trees. This is a scenario where, at least from the outside, it appears we had all the leverage and should have gotten Lilly for free or with a small add from TO.
 
Hodge

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,642
7,902
Interestingly, the Leafs paid Liljegren a $2.4 million bonus on July 1 so the Sharks really only owe him about $850k for the rest of this season then $2.6 million next year. Just about $1 million more than what Benning is owed on his contract. Toronto probably expected to trade him all along.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Sandisfan
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X