Hodge
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2021
- 6,295
- 7,562
What a childish response.
They’re not my precious models, they’re a tool for evaluation.
Here are several models with differing evaluations of him as a player. I didn't find one that said he was one of the worst players in the NHL last year.
I don't need to accept your opinion as fact, or find the validity in it, because when asked, you make no effort to provide any support for it. Once again, an appeal to authority requires supporting evidence. Repeating yourself incessantly does not count as proof, and neither does sarcasm or petty insults. If you try to support your position, people will take you seriously, but you're not giving anyone a reason to.
Do you know how to read your own charts? Here, I made it easier for you:
The part in the red circle is what shows Walman was one of the worst players in the league last season. You're welcome.
See above but also on the most basic level the Red Wings 5v5 xGF% last season was 41% with Walman on the ice and 48% with him off.Could you link to those? I did some digging today and nothing I found showed anything of the sort, especially when you consider his usage.
If you want to blame that entirely on usage be my guest but why would his usage be any different in SJ?
Yeah, a physical two-way center with almost 600 games of experience including two championships is worth more than a guy who has had one good season in his entire career at age 28. I will keep it up with this take.Yeah, Goodrow is barely overpaid at 3.6M x 3 and Walman is an albatross at 3.4 x 2. Keep up with that take