All the people who are pissed about the Pinto situation have every right to be. It's confusing and frustrating for him not to be in the lineup. I think people are not giving enough thought though to the long term issue at hand.
Say they find a number for a 1 year deal and he gets back in the lineup soon. Then what? Will the next negotiation be different? If it's this hard to find common ground on a 1 year deal then what's going to happen when they start talking about possible 5-8 year extensions?
And does the team want to make space in their cap structure for a 3C at whatever number he thinks he merits on that term? Does the team even see him as a valuable enough piece to lock him in at 3C for the foreseeable future? Greig's play has been really good and he brings a dimension to the position that Pinto doesn't - and, so far, without a drop in offensive production.
Basically the question is: if they think his longterm demands are not going to be in line with the team's allocation for a 3C, and, they have an internal replacement in Greig, playing today, then does it make sense to expend assets to fit him in this year?
I think Greig will make his way into the top 6 as a winger, and Pinto has the potential to be a really important piece moving forward.
Idk what needs to happen to fit him in, so it's hard to gauge what the right move is.
That said, if this was a case of digging in over 2x2.5 instead of 2x2.1 you'd have to think they could have figured something out already.
I could see Pinto refusing a 1 yr deal based purely on risk of a career ending injury, and maybe Dorion's only prepared to do a 1yr deal because of cap constraints. So if that's the case, and you're at a stalemate, what do you do, trade him away because of poor cap management, sit him all year and poison the relationship? Or cave and trade off assets to make room for his demands?
If we do choose the trade him, I'd be looking for alFoligno for Methot type of deal.