Rantanen signed immediately after Marner (I remember reading that he was waiting to see what Marner would get) .. im guessing Sakic saw Marners contract and immediately signed Rantanens asking price. Betting Marner drove the price of Rantanen up... so I wouldn't use Rantanen as a comparable for Marner.In terms of cap hits:
- JT signed for less here than what SJ and NYI offered - so no overpayment there.
- Matthews had all the leverage as he was going to get big RFA offers from Arizona and other American teams. Still maybe a slight overpayment given what Eichel and McDavid got.
- Marner signed at the same time as Rantanen, for $1.5 more. Clear overpayment.
- Willy signed a fair deal but Dubas set a bad precedent for making him whole with the bonus structure - ensuring that Willy didn't lose any money for sitting out. That was weak.
Overall, maybe $3 mil overpayment for the core 4, in my opinion.
Yup 47 goal 88 point 28 year old center for free (but cap space) is the wrong move.
Using your numbers it looks like an overpayment of 3-4 even though you cannot judge a persons value just by what someone else might have paid him but I will give you that however I think a valid point is that we did not need Tavares. We already had 3 very good forwards so if you look at it from a forward unit the over payment is closer to 13-14- millionIn terms of cap hits:
- JT signed for less here than what SJ and NYI offered - so no overpayment there.
- Matthews had all the leverage as he was going to get big RFA offers from Arizona and other American teams. Still maybe a slight overpayment given what Eichel and McDavid got.
- Marner signed at the same time as Rantanen, for $1.5 more. Clear overpayment.
- Willy signed a fair deal but Dubas set a bad precedent for making him whole with the bonus structure - ensuring that Willy didn't lose any money for sitting out. That was weak.
Overall, maybe $3 mil overpayment for the core 4, in my opinion.
Wasted? He had 46 goals and 88 points his first year and was rated 12 in scoring chance generating plays. Centered are more valuable than wingers.And what difference has he made? He WAS 28, that's gone, that's history. 3 years already wasted.
What did those 88 points get him or us……no awards for him and no playoff rounds for the teamWasted? He had 46 goals and 88 points his first year and was rated 12 in scoring chance generating plays. Centered are more valuable than wingers.
Wasted? He had 46 goals and 88 points his first year and was rated 12 in scoring chance generating plays. Centered are more valuable than wingers.
What about Wilson's... San Jose reportedly was willing to offer something like 14 million oer.There is no world where Tavares is worth 11 million other then Dubbie world
Its a done deal.He might just be someone else’s franchise guy in 3 years a la JT.
JT said he wanted to keep everybody. Not his fault dubas screwed the team by overpaying 3 RFAs. How many good players have been casualties of the cap?And what difference has he made? He WAS 28, that's gone, that's history. 3 years already wasted. Amazing signing!
It doesn’t matter what someone is willing to offer. GM’s over pay all the time.What about Wilson's... San Jose reportedly was willing to offer something like 14 million oer.
It doesn’t matter what someone is willing to offer. GM’s over pay all the time.
What matters is what player and position you need at the time and how that player/position can help you win and that determines their value.
At the time he was absolutely the wrong player they needed but Dubas want to make a big splash to launch his GM career and it will ultimately be his downfall
And he failed in thatI am talking about playoff success. I couldn't care less about his regular season points. He was brought in to bring us over the hump and beat Boston.
Using your numbers it looks like an overpayment of 3-4 even though you cannot judge a persons value just by what someone else might have paid him but I will give you that however I think a valid point is that we did not need Tavares. We already had 3 very good forwards so if you look at it from a forward unit the over payment is closer to 13-14- million
I don’t have a real knock against JT. I just do not think they needed him.Signing JT made them the strongest team down the middle. Subsequent overpayments and his flawed vision are his downfall.
I will admit I thought it was a good move but in my wildest dream I never thought we would have 3-11 million players.Mitch by $1.5, Willy 500k, AM 500k-1mil I think. $3m net. Definitely could have used that $3m right about now - no question.
I'll be fair with JT - whole board was celebrating the signing so I can't use hindsight to fault Dubas on it. But there was contemporaneous consensus on rfas being overpaid, so that blame is well earned.
Idiot should have signed 34 for 8 years and bridged marner. Only way you can keep 34 and give yourself some cap space.I will admit I thought it was a good move but in my wildest dream I never thought we would have 3-11 million players.
yup word was Ranta among others were waiting for Dubas to get bent over and re set the market againRantanen signed immediately after Marner (I remember reading that he was waiting to see what Marner would get) .. im guessing Sakic saw Marners contract and immediately signed Rantanens asking price. Betting Marner drove the price of Rantanen up... so I wouldn't use Rantanen as a comparable for Marner.
Signing players you dont need is 100% overpayment.- JT signed for less here than what SJ and NYI offered - so no overpayment there.
A) spell his name right dude, misspelling it makes it hard to take anything else you say seriously.Taveras was the wrong signing at the time period.
How does one not need a Tavares?Signing players you dont need is 100% overpayment.
Tavares + Marner => Marner overpay.
Having Tavares and Matthews down the middle is a huge blessing and the least of our worries.
Our big problem is the 11m on the wing.
Amen.Signing Tavares was fine.
Making Matthews the franchise guy would have been fine if it was for 8 years.He might just be someone else’s franchise guy in 3 years a la JT.
You don’t sign 2 wingers for almost 20 million after that.
2 5/6 million wingers are fine.
Nylander 6.9 and a 6 mil guy who can drive the net, get dirty and score some goals.
And the money for an entire 3rd line that can go the same.
If you truly believe Marner is overpaid because of Tavares, isn't that more reason signing JT was a good thing? Maybe we should have traded Matthews. After all, if not for him there's no way Nylander gets the contract he did right? Imagine not wanting a guy because he makes others better.Tavares scored alot inflating Marner's points and that led to Marner's overpay.
We had Matthews, Marner and Nylander.
WE NEEDED D.
and a goalie.