hatterson
Registered User
Nice dive Henderson
lol that wasn't a dive. He just ran into a stationary defender.
Nice dive Henderson
They played well until Damsgaard was subbed. Wasn't that the first sub? Am I blanking on someone?That’s just not true.
They did didly the last 20 mins of the 2nd half.
and tried to defend in the first ot half.
Well I could say I disagree, Denmark produced forward momentum the first 70mins.Great, you don't have anything to counter statistics so you attack the poster. HFBoards101.
They played well until Damsgaard was subbed. Wasn't that the first sub? Am I blanking on someone?
Yes, he was.They played well until Damsgaard was subbed. Wasn't that the first sub? Am I blanking on someone?
And since then the Danish didn't do a lot.They made a triple sub at 67' Larsen Damsgaard and Dolberg out, Wass, Poulsen, and Norgaard on
Please.France - Switzerland is a false equivalence.
One was a 50:50 game. This one is just England having a lot of the ball and not doing much with it.
France bled chances against the Swiss. England got owned by a free kick.
Cheering for the Danes here but that’s a bad comparison IMO
Why has this become an attack on Canadian broadcasting ? Such an odd deflection of anger.
We are 10 players against 11, what do people expect.Danes simply running on fumes.
Switzerland almost scored right before Coman’s post on the other end lolPlease.
France created way more chances and hit the post at the last minute.
France clearly gifted more chances than England but France also created way more than England.
Anyway, England doesn't deserve to be through when not scoring a proper goal in the whole game.
You rarely get a card for protecting your face.Like I said.
Iffy ref