PlayOn
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2010
- 1,939
- 2,528
I hope he proves me wrong but Timmy Stutzle is giving me Alex Galchenyuk vibes right about now..
he will prove you wrong, don’t worry.
I hope he proves me wrong but Timmy Stutzle is giving me Alex Galchenyuk vibes right about now..
Chuck was with Stutzle. Paul was with Brown, Paul switched off for Brady.
Sure, Stützle owns a big part of that play, but two on one's happen all the time, a guy with 700 games under his belt has to do a better job when put in that position.
I agree that Mete sucked during the game, but the trick is to put these deck chairs in a position to succeed. 3v3 with lots of ice to work with plays to Mete's only strength.Mete was pretty rough... OT should really just be Zub and Chabot taking turns.
Mete was pretty rough... OT should really just be Zub and Chabot taking turns.
I hope he proves me wrong but Timmy Stutzle is giving me Alex Galchenyuk vibes right about now..
He's not floating.also tkachuk seriously needs to be better. he is not looking like an $8mil player out there. batherson and norris show up and this guy get 1 good chance and floats
also tkachuk seriously needs to be better. he is not looking like an $8mil player out there. batherson and norris show up and this guy get 1 good chance and floats
Zub or Mete should play the 3v3 before MDZ does.
I said earlier it’s not in the D alone. When we get in those fire drill situations it’s also on our forwards. Our young guys are not quite there yet defensively and a couple of the vets like Ennis are terrible densively. It’s simple one turnover and we completely breakdown and either get lost, stop moving or over commit trying to cover for someone else. It’s a 5 man breakdown.Maybe if instead of vets like Zaitsev and MDZ we went out and got competent Dmen we wouldn't have allowed 40 plus shots. The issue wasn't lack of vets, it was lack of talent on the backend.
Stutzle may be fun to watch but it would be really nice if he was even remotely defensively responsible.
Lol wtf are you on about he was on the ice for two goals his linemates scored, creating space for them by going hard to the net. "Floating" my ass.
Stutzle fault that this happened.
Stutzle fault that this happened.
Then why do we look so much better defensively when Chabot and zub are on the ice? Hockey is a d game but when you are ass defensively a massive reason will be because the defenders are shitI said earlier it’s not in the D alone. When we get in those fire drill situations it’s also on our forwards. Our young guys are not quite there yet defensively and a couple of the vets like Ennis are terrible densively. It’s simple one turnover and we completely breakdown and either get lost, stop moving or over commit trying to cover for someone else. It’s a 5 man breakdown.
Again, that's fine. It's even more effective when the Dman back takes neither the shot nor the pass away. It was horribly played by MDZ, why are you so adamantly deflecting away from his role?a 2-1 with time in the NHL is probably the most effective play that results in goals. lose lose as a D, it's a cointoss.
Mete sucked tonight and MDZ had two points, can’t really fault him for throwing him out there.